Because the maximum reproduction ratio for the 20-35 is measured at 35mm and minimum focus distance, while the 20mm is much wider but focuses closer. It is like comparing two different lenses for this spec. They certainly aren't quoting the reproduction ratio for the 20mm end. Mike Pierre Bellavance wrote: > > Hi, > > What surprises me is that the magnification ratios of these two lenses are > almost the same (0.14 for the 20mm vs 0.13 for the 20-35) while their > closest focusing distances are quite different. > > How can that be? > > Pierre * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Robert Meier
- EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. Jim Davis
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. M.J.Shupe
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. Bob Talbot
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. Pierre Bellavance
- EOS Wide Angle Lens links Julian Loke
- Re: EOS Wide Angle Lens links Julian Loke
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes M.J.Shupe
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS Will I be satisfied with the 100-400/4,5-5,... Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS Will I be satisfied with the 100-400/4,5-5,... Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS Will I be satisfied with the 100-400/4,5-5,... Julian Loke
- Re: EOS Will I be satisfied with the 100-400/4,5-5,... Hugo G�vert
- Re: EOS Will I be satisfied with the 100-400/4,5-5,... Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS Will I be satisfied with the 100-400/4,5-5,6L IS... Hugo G�vert
