> it should be 20/35 times the reproduction ratio at 35mm. I think. It needn't be. If I had one here I would set it on minimum focus and bring a long ruler in to focus - with the 1n's 100% viewfinder (confirmed ;o) the answer pops out. Takes less time than speculation ... if only I had one . Bob * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Jim Davis
- EOS Photographing dogs Karen Nakamura
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Bob Talbot
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Robert Meier
- EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. Jim Davis
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. M.J.Shupe
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. Bob Talbot
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. Pierre Bellavance
- EOS Wide Angle Lens links Julian Loke
- Re: EOS Wide Angle Lens links Julian Loke
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes M.J.Shupe
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS Will I be satisfied with the 100-400/4,5-5,6L IS... Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS Will I be satisfied with the 100-400/4,5-5,6L IS... Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS Will I be satisfied with the 100-400/4,5-5,6L IS... Julian Loke
- Re: EOS Will I be satisfied with the 100-400/4,5-5,6L IS... Hugo G�vert
- Re: EOS Will I be satisfied with the 100-400/4,5-5,6L IS... Bob Meyer
