it should be 20/35 times the reproduction ratio at 35mm.  I think.  What
was the reproduction ratio at 35?  Something like .l3?  Well, then it
would be .074, or 1:13.5.  My math could be totally screwy here, but it
sounds about right.  

Mike



Pierre Bellavance wrote:

> I repeat my question: Anyone know the magnification ratio on the 20-35 at
> 20mm and 1.1 feet?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Pierre
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to