it should be 20/35 times the reproduction ratio at 35mm. I think. What was the reproduction ratio at 35? Something like .l3? Well, then it would be .074, or 1:13.5. My math could be totally screwy here, but it sounds about right. Mike Pierre Bellavance wrote: > I repeat my question: Anyone know the magnification ratio on the 20-35 at > 20mm and 1.1 feet? > > Thanks. > > Pierre * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Julian Loke
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Jim Davis
- EOS Photographing dogs Karen Nakamura
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Bob Talbot
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Robert Meier
- EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. Jim Davis
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. M.J.Shupe
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. Bob Talbot
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 - Magnification Ratio at 20mm. Pierre Bellavance
- EOS Wide Angle Lens links Julian Loke
- Re: EOS Wide Angle Lens links Julian Loke
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes M.J.Shupe
- Re: EOS EF 20-35 with extension tubes Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS Will I be satisfied with the 100-400/4,5-5,6L IS... Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS Will I be satisfied with the 100-400/4,5-5,6L IS... Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS Will I be satisfied with the 100-400/4,5-5,6L IS... Julian Loke
- Re: EOS Will I be satisfied with the 100-400/4,5-5,6L IS... Hugo G�vert
