Good. That is...before the fact..there is fact. The existence of phenomena..'data'...is independent of the conscious fact that, it is there.
On Jun 5, 2011 12:29 PM, "Lonnie Clay" <claylon...@comcast.net> wrote: Oof Misunderstanding! Information continuously cycles within an awareness between the so called "conscious mind", the "memory", and the "subconscious". Furthermore there are often many layers within each of those broad categories, each of which exchanges content within its own realm of control. For example, when I want to fetch a particular datum from memory due to a fleeting wisp of recollection, I must follow a path of mnemonically associated compactions to attain retrieval. If I have secreted the memory to prevent unauthorized extraction, then I must also follow a keying sequence of permissible windows of synchronization, such that I am not diverted into false leads which provide bogus imitations of the buried data. Information exists as datums taken WITHIN CONTEXT in my mind. Perhaps I could clarify by saying that every transitional exchange of a datum is information regardless of whether the transmitter and receiver are located within the same awareness? As extraction proceeds, the information attains a solidity of form which approaches clarity of its true meaning, until the final stage is attained with the clarity at which the datum was stored. This begs the question of how much subtext is contained in the clarified information, and how many associated datums must be synthesized together within the conscious mind to attain a true vision of the meaningfulness of the data. So far as derived conclusions go based upon the gibberish which I spout - Arrggghhhh Yaarrr, Good Luck Pilgrim! Lonnie Courtney Clay On Saturday, June 4, 2011 8:01:57 AM UTC-7, Awori wrote: > > > > > Interesting...but the assumption is that data only becomes information > when it is transmitted f... > > > > > > On Jun 4, 2011 4:54 PM, "Lonnie Clay" <clayl...@comcast.net> wrote: > > > Wonderful to hear from ... > > To post to this group, send email to episte...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > epistemology...@googlegroups.com. > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group.... To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/epistemology/-/MFh5Q3JvSFB3UVFK. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group,... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
