I call it zapping and visioning. I will share with you something i wrote towards that end.
Thank you. On Jun 6, 2011 7:56 AM, "Lonnie Clay" <claylon...@comcast.net> wrote: > Try introspection and self realization, proceed onwards to reprogram your > own mind as you see fit. I started the process in the third grade with > mnemonic associative memory retrieval techniques, for which I thank Mrs. > Dowd, who would likely be in her 80s by now if not dead. My earlier teachers > before the AT program regarded me as a pestilential nuisance, but AT program > teachers regarded us all as a challenge to their own ability to take raw ore > and turn it into glittering blades of intellectual incisiveness. Somewhere > along the way I became distracted by entertainment rather than pondering, > but I THINK that I have shaken off the death grip of frivolousness. To > clarify a point regarding my posts elsewhere, I use frivolity to see if I > can prod unguarded responses from others goaded into replying. The problem > with being intelligent is that your wits become dull if you fail to clash > swords with similar talents. > > If you have a child at hand to manipulate, be cautious, because there is > untapped potential in even the most obviously dim-witted of youths. Did you > ever stop to think that perhaps a so called dimwit merely finds the outside > world dull and lacking challenge, sunken into introspective apathy from > boredom? I suspect that lacking brain damage in the womb, all infants are > more or less intellectually equal, what varies widely is the traction gained > by the environment upon the infant's attention. If you want a child to > succeed with worldly interaction, then provide a stimulus rich environment. > To attain failure, place into a white crib in a soundless white room and > initiate sensory deprivation protocols. > > As an adult you will probably be forced to employ more sophisticated tricks > to derail old habits of thought. Couple the activities which provide maximum > reinforcement of changed protocols with reinforcing rewards. Pavlov knew a > trick or two. As a revised mental process gains strength through usage, vary > the reinforcing rewards so that the specificity of cues is diminished. > Eventually you will be able to shake loose from semi-compulsory associations > and range freely within your own mind, cultivating your programmed processes > with any applicable mental tool at hand rather than having to employ a > specific trick. > > Lonnie Courtney Clay > > > On Sunday, June 5, 2011 4:57:16 AM UTC-7, Awori wrote: >> >> We are there...if not almost! >> >> On Jun 5, 2011 2:51 PM, "Lonnie Clay" <clayl...@comcast.net> wrote: >> > Mmmhhhmmm... It Goes something like this : >> > >> > [Context -> Interaction -> Events] -> >> > [Observations -> Abstractions -> Prioritization and Categorization -> >> > Memorization -> Recall -> Pondering and Correlation] >> > >> > Lonnie Courtney Clay >> > >> > On Sunday, June 5, 2011 3:55:24 AM UTC-7, Awori wrote: >> >> >> >> Good. That is...before the fact..there is fact. The existence of >> >> phenomena..'data'...is independent of the conscious fact that, it is >> there. >> >> >> >> On Jun 5, 2011 12:29 PM, "Lonnie Clay" <clay...@comcast.net> wrote: >> >> Oof Misunderstanding! Information continuously cycles within an >> awareness >> >> between the so called "conscious mind", the "memory", and the >> >> "subconscious". Furthermore there are often many layers within each of >> those >> >> broad categories, each of which exchanges content within its own realm >> of >> >> control. For example, when I want to fetch a particular datum from >> memory >> >> due to a fleeting wisp of recollection, I must follow a path of >> mnemonically >> >> associated compactions to attain retrieval. If I have secreted the >> memory to >> >> prevent unauthorized extraction, then I must also follow a keying >> sequence >> >> of permissible windows of synchronization, such that I am not diverted >> into >> >> false leads which provide bogus imitations of the buried data. >> Information >> >> exists as datums taken WITHIN CONTEXT in my mind. Perhaps I could >> clarify by >> >> saying that every transitional exchange of a datum is information >> regardless >> >> of whether the transmitter and receiver are located within the same >> >> awareness? As extraction proceeds, the information attains a solidity of >> >> >> form which approaches clarity of its true meaning, until the final stage >> is >> >> attained with the clarity at which the datum was stored. This begs the >> >> question of how much subtext is contained in the clarified information, >> and >> >> how many associated datums must be synthesized together within the >> conscious >> >> mind to attain a true vision of the meaningfulness of the data. >> >> >> >> So far as derived conclusions go based upon the gibberish which I spout >> - >> >> Arrggghhhh Yaarrr, Good Luck Pilgrim! >> >> >> >> Lonnie Courtney Clay >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Saturday, June 4, 2011 8:01:57 AM UTC-7, Awori wrote: >> >> >> >>> >> >>> > >> >>> > Interesting...but the assumption is that data only becomes >> information >> >>> when it is transmitted f... >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >> >>> > On Jun 4, 2011 4:54 PM, "Lonnie Clay" <cla...@comcast.net> wrote: >> >>> > > Wonderful to hear from ... >> >>> > To post to this group, send email to epi...@googlegroups.com. >> >>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >>> epist...@googlegroups.com. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > > For more options, visit this group at >> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. >> >>> > > >> >>> >> >>> >> >> -- >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >> >> "Epistemology" group.... >> >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/epistemology/-/MFh5Q3JvSFB3UVFK. >> >> >> >> >> >> To post to this group, send email to epis...@googlegroups.com. >> >> To unsubscribe from this group,... >> >> >> >> >> > >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Epistemology" group. >> > To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/epistemology/-/LWstQTBZenJvZ3NK. >> > To post to this group, send email to episte...@googlegroups.com. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> epistemology...@googlegroups.com. >> > For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. >> > >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/epistemology/-/TDlHTnFBaUo2djRK. > To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
