Mmmhhhmmm... It Goes something like this : [Context -> Interaction -> Events] -> [Observations -> Abstractions -> Prioritization and Categorization -> Memorization -> Recall -> Pondering and Correlation]
Lonnie Courtney Clay On Sunday, June 5, 2011 3:55:24 AM UTC-7, Awori wrote: > > Good. That is...before the fact..there is fact. The existence of > phenomena..'data'...is independent of the conscious fact that, it is there. > > On Jun 5, 2011 12:29 PM, "Lonnie Clay" <clayl...@comcast.net> wrote: > Oof Misunderstanding! Information continuously cycles within an awareness > between the so called "conscious mind", the "memory", and the > "subconscious". Furthermore there are often many layers within each of those > broad categories, each of which exchanges content within its own realm of > control. For example, when I want to fetch a particular datum from memory > due to a fleeting wisp of recollection, I must follow a path of mnemonically > associated compactions to attain retrieval. If I have secreted the memory to > prevent unauthorized extraction, then I must also follow a keying sequence > of permissible windows of synchronization, such that I am not diverted into > false leads which provide bogus imitations of the buried data. Information > exists as datums taken WITHIN CONTEXT in my mind. Perhaps I could clarify by > saying that every transitional exchange of a datum is information regardless > of whether the transmitter and receiver are located within the same > awareness? As extraction proceeds, the information attains a solidity of > form which approaches clarity of its true meaning, until the final stage is > attained with the clarity at which the datum was stored. This begs the > question of how much subtext is contained in the clarified information, and > how many associated datums must be synthesized together within the conscious > mind to attain a true vision of the meaningfulness of the data. > > So far as derived conclusions go based upon the gibberish which I spout - > Arrggghhhh Yaarrr, Good Luck Pilgrim! > > Lonnie Courtney Clay > > > > > On Saturday, June 4, 2011 8:01:57 AM UTC-7, Awori wrote: > >> >> > >> > Interesting...but the assumption is that data only becomes information >> when it is transmitted f... >> >> >> > >> > On Jun 4, 2011 4:54 PM, "Lonnie Clay" <clay...@comcast.net> wrote: >> > > Wonderful to hear from ... >> > To post to this group, send email to epis...@googlegroups.com. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> epistem...@googlegroups.com. >> >> >> > > For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. >> > > >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Epistemology" group.... > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/epistemology/-/MFh5Q3JvSFB3UVFK. > > > To post to this group, send email to episte...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group,... > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/epistemology/-/LWstQTBZenJvZ3NK. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
