Physicists are experimenting with cavities Carlos. I'll get back - as a mere biochemist I need to codge up.
On Jun 6, 7:08 am, awori achoka <awori.ach...@gmail.com> wrote: > I call it zapping and visioning. I will share with you something i wrote > towards that end. > > Thank you. > > On Jun 6, 2011 7:56 AM, "Lonnie Clay" <claylon...@comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Try introspection and self realization, proceed onwards to reprogram your > > own mind as you see fit. I started the process in the third grade with > > mnemonic associative memory retrieval techniques, for which I thank Mrs. > > Dowd, who would likely be in her 80s by now if not dead. My earlier > teachers > > before the AT program regarded me as a pestilential nuisance, but AT > program > > teachers regarded us all as a challenge to their own ability to take raw > ore > > and turn it into glittering blades of intellectual incisiveness. Somewhere > > along the way I became distracted by entertainment rather than pondering, > > but I THINK that I have shaken off the death grip of frivolousness. To > > clarify a point regarding my posts elsewhere, I use frivolity to see if I > > can prod unguarded responses from others goaded into replying. The problem > > with being intelligent is that your wits become dull if you fail to clash > > swords with similar talents. > > > If you have a child at hand to manipulate, be cautious, because there is > > untapped potential in even the most obviously dim-witted of youths. Did > you > > ever stop to think that perhaps a so called dimwit merely finds the > outside > > world dull and lacking challenge, sunken into introspective apathy from > > boredom? I suspect that lacking brain damage in the womb, all infants are > > more or less intellectually equal, what varies widely is the traction > gained > > by the environment upon the infant's attention. If you want a child to > > succeed with worldly interaction, then provide a stimulus rich > environment. > > To attain failure, place into a white crib in a soundless white room and > > initiate sensory deprivation protocols. > > > As an adult you will probably be forced to employ more sophisticated > tricks > > to derail old habits of thought. Couple the activities which provide > maximum > > reinforcement of changed protocols with reinforcing rewards. Pavlov knew a > > trick or two. As a revised mental process gains strength through usage, > vary > > the reinforcing rewards so that the specificity of cues is diminished. > > Eventually you will be able to shake loose from semi-compulsory > associations > > and range freely within your own mind, cultivating your programmed > processes > > with any applicable mental tool at hand rather than having to employ a > > specific trick. > > > Lonnie Courtney Clay > > > On Sunday, June 5, 2011 4:57:16 AM UTC-7, Awori wrote: > > >> We are there...if not almost! > > >> On Jun 5, 2011 2:51 PM, "Lonnie Clay" <clayl...@comcast.net> wrote: > >> > Mmmhhhmmm... It Goes something like this : > > >> > [Context -> Interaction -> Events] -> > >> > [Observations -> Abstractions -> Prioritization and Categorization -> > >> > Memorization -> Recall -> Pondering and Correlation] > > >> > Lonnie Courtney Clay > > >> > On Sunday, June 5, 2011 3:55:24 AM UTC-7, Awori wrote: > > >> >> Good. That is...before the fact..there is fact. The existence of > >> >> phenomena..'data'...is independent of the conscious fact that, it is > >> there. > > >> >> On Jun 5, 2011 12:29 PM, "Lonnie Clay" <clay...@comcast.net> wrote: > >> >> Oof Misunderstanding! Information continuously cycles within an > >> awareness > >> >> between the so called "conscious mind", the "memory", and the > >> >> "subconscious". Furthermore there are often many layers within each of > >> those > >> >> broad categories, each of which exchanges content within its own realm > >> of > >> >> control. For example, when I want to fetch a particular datum from > >> memory > >> >> due to a fleeting wisp of recollection, I must follow a path of > >> mnemonically > >> >> associated compactions to attain retrieval. If I have secreted the > >> memory to > >> >> prevent unauthorized extraction, then I must also follow a keying > >> sequence > >> >> of permissible windows of synchronization, such that I am not diverted > >> into > >> >> false leads which provide bogus imitations of the buried data. > >> Information > >> >> exists as datums taken WITHIN CONTEXT in my mind. Perhaps I could > >> clarify by > >> >> saying that every transitional exchange of a datum is information > >> regardless > >> >> of whether the transmitter and receiver are located within the same > >> >> awareness? As extraction proceeds, the information attains a solidity > of > > >> >> form which approaches clarity of its true meaning, until the final > stage > >> is > >> >> attained with the clarity at which the datum was stored. This begs the > >> >> question of how much subtext is contained in the clarified > information, > >> and > >> >> how many associated datums must be synthesized together within the > >> conscious > >> >> mind to attain a true vision of the meaningfulness of the data. > > >> >> So far as derived conclusions go based upon the gibberish which I > spout > >> - > >> >> Arrggghhhh Yaarrr, Good Luck Pilgrim! > > >> >> Lonnie Courtney Clay > > >> >> On Saturday, June 4, 2011 8:01:57 AM UTC-7, Awori wrote: > > >> >>> > Interesting...but the assumption is that data only becomes > >> information > >> >>> when it is transmitted f... > > >> >>> > On Jun 4, 2011 4:54 PM, "Lonnie Clay" <cla...@comcast.net> wrote: > >> >>> > > Wonderful to hear from ... > >> >>> > To post to this group, send email to epi...@googlegroups.com. > >> >>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> >>> epist...@googlegroups.com. > > >> >>> > > For more options, visit this group at > >> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > > >> >> -- > >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> Groups > >> >> "Epistemology" group.... > >> >> To view this discussion on the web visit > >> >>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/epistemology/-/MFh5Q3JvSFB3UVFK. > > >> >> To post to this group, send email to epis...@googlegroups.com. > >> >> To unsubscribe from this group,... > > >> > -- > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >> "Epistemology" group. > >> > To view this discussion on the web visit > >>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/epistemology/-/LWstQTBZenJvZ3NK. > >> > To post to this group, send email to episte...@googlegroups.com. > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> epistemology...@googlegroups.com. > >> > For more options, visit this group at > >>http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Epistemology" group.> To view this discussion on the web visit > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/epistemology/-/TDlHTnFBaUo2djRK.> To post to > this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.> For more options, visit this > group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > > > > > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
