Where is the root of all elements ? =. An interesting stuff (phys.org, Oct 2012) Lithium in action: Advanced imaging method reveals fundamental reactions behind battery technology The nano-engineering technology is grown every day, every day a new success - new discovery. And it seems that really all elements are magical and amazing. ==. But . . . . . 1 Let us say that we want to write a full theory about elements. Then we cannot begin from the lithium. Lithium is too complex element. The Periodic table says we need to begin from hydrogen. But in my opinion we need to begin from helium II. Why? Helium II exists below at 2.19 K We don’t know any another element that exist below this coefficient Below is Nothingness : T=0K The idea of the Nothingness is not a new one. There are enough physicists who try to understand it. # When the next revolution rocks physics, chances are it will be about nothing—the vacuum, that endless infinite void. http://discovermagazine.com/2008/aug/18-nothingness-of-space-theory-of-everything # And Paul Dirac wrote: " The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion, is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description of something more complex? " ==. 2 Professor Yang Shao-Horn says: "We focused on finding out what really happens during charging and discharging,"
In my opinion there isn’t charging and discharging without photon ( electric charge) =. So, we come again to QED: what is happen in interaction between photon / electron ( quantum of light) and matter. =. All the best. Israel Sadovnik Socratus =. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
