Thank you--humbled indeed.

More thinking needs to go into this--it might just lead us to unravel what
we refer to as, life, nature and consciousness. If as you
conclude--photonic energy determines what is living (and i fully
agree!)--then it is indeed the fundamental life force. Does dark
matter/energy--imply the absence of photonic energy? Am i again absurdly
wrong here?


**
*Committed to strategic visioning and the state of our nationhood.
*
**


On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 1:31 PM, sadovnik socratus <is.socra...@gmail.com>wrote:

> More details.
> ==============
>          Photon and Matter =  Life and Death.
> =.
> Why is connection between Photon and Matter is equal to connection
> between  Life and Death ?
> My explanation.
> QED try to understand the interaction between photon and matter.
> In 1985   Richard  Feynman wrote the result of QED's searching :
> ‘ The idea of book -  the interaction between light
> ( electromagnetic fields ) and matter is strange.
> . . . . . . . . . .  .
>  The theory of quantum electrodynamics
> describes Nature as absurd from the point of view
> of common sense. And it agrees fully with experiment.
> So I hope you accept Nature as She is — absurd. ‘
> / book:
> QED:  The Strange Theory of Light and Matter  page 10. /
> =..
> Can Nature be absurd ?
> Is  our intellect or Nature absurd ?
> Nature is in a harmony but our acceptation and meaning of  It is
> absurd.
> ==.
> Light, quantum of light (photon) is a particle which takes very
> important
>  part  in our life.
>       The interaction of photon with matter is possible to observe
>  in crystals and in vital organisms.
>  (every living being needs light / photon.)
>  Now everyone think that photon is an undeveloped particle and
>  it seems nonsense to say that photon can evolve,
>  taking interaction from simple to complex system and
> be bearer of  information / consciousness.
>
> But on the one hand, nobody knows what photon is.
> On the other hand , photon can move with different speeds:
>  constant speed c=1 , and faster c>1, and in my opinion
>  can have zero speed c=0.
> ( the common opinion that photon never can stop is not a law,
>  it is a supposition)
> And if  photon can use two different  inner  impulses  (spin)
>    h ( photon behaves like corpuscular )
> and  h*=h/2pi ( photon behaves like wave )
>  for its independent  movement
> ( it means photon itself decided  how to act,
> what kind of  movement to do)   then I say:
> to take decision how to act can only a thinking particle.
> And as in the ancient Veda is written t the consciousness
>  can develop  from a vague wish to a clear thought.
>  =.
> The simplest atom hydrogen  consists on proton and electron.
> Electron tied with atom by the  energy: E=-me^4/2h*^2= -13,6eV.
> But if someone parameter changes,  then electron jumps out from
>  atom as a quantum of light with energy E=h*f  ( it is said:  electron
>  emits quantum of light, but where this quantum of light is hidden
>  in the  electron, in which pocket ?)
> So, it is possible to say that atom with photon/ electron is
> absolutely
>  different  from atom without photon/ electron.
> The atom with photon/ electron is a living system.
>  The atom without photon/ electron  is a  dead  system.
> The same is about complex  and  biological atoms.
> ===..
> In the ancient Veda also is written that the Universe is consist on
> two
>  different particles:  purusha ( a spiritual or conscious element )
> and
>  prakrti  ( a mechanical-matter particle)
> The interaction between mind /consciousness elements and
> matter particles created everything.
> ==.
> There is nothing new under the Sun:
> every new idea has some sort of precedent or echo from the past.
> ===..==.
> All the best
> Israel Socratus
> ===…
> P.S.
> I want to thank   awori achoka and  Philip Benjamin :
>  reading their comments helped me to come to this conclusion.
> =.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Epistemology" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to