Reference frames and Existence.
===… There are many pretty solid theories. How can be known which theory is wrong and which theory is true ? The answer depends on which reference frame the theory is based. The conception of reference frame is the key to know if the theory is true one. # We know many different reference frames ( free, open, closed , 2D, 3D, 4D, 5D, 11D, . . . MD . . . . ) Existence cannot begin from a complex system. In the beginning must be a simple model. Therefore, I will take a two dimensions space as the simplest model. But there are two kinds of two dimensions: the Euclidean ( 2D) space and Minkowski negative Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D space. What is possible to say about these systems ? Which reference frame can be taken as a basis of Existence ? # Euclidean ( 2D) reference frame belongs to a gravity space where space and time are two different substances. Minkowski negative Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D has no gravity and space and time are one and the same unite continuum. # Later Descartes changed Euclidean two dimensions into three dimensions . Living in this Descartes system of coordinate we try to understand : where did our existence come from ? Then, in my opinion, it is logically to take Minkowski negative Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D ( without gravity ) as the simplest model to have the searching answer. ============…. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
