If you don't have sense, you can't discern identity. If you don't have a sense to compare and infer among sensations, there can be no action or sequence. If you begin with sense, then energy and time are two halves of the same thing, which is that sense of comparison of experiences, and space is the sense of contrast between parallel histories of experience.
Craig On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 9:50:07 AM UTC-4, Lonnie Clay wrote: > > At the minimum, you need an identity, an action, and a sequence to exist. > That requires space, energy, and time. Whether energy should be considered > a dimension is dependent upon whether there exists a minimum quanta of > energy required for the least action operation. See : > > https://sites.google.com/site/lonniecourtneyclay/home/blarney-part1-mythology > > Lonnie Courtney Clay > > > On Saturday, August 3, 2013 4:58:59 PM UTC-7, sadovnik socratus wrote: >> >> Reference frames and Existence. >> >> ===… >> >> There are many pretty solid theories. >> >> How can be known which theory is wrong and which theory is true ? >> >> The answer depends on which reference frame the theory is based. >> >> The conception of reference frame is the key to know if the theory is >> true one. >> >> # >> >> We know many different reference frames >> >> ( free, open, closed , 2D, 3D, 4D, 5D, 11D, . . . MD . . . . ) >> >> >> >> Existence cannot begin from a complex system. >> >> In the beginning must be a simple model. >> >> Therefore, I will take a two dimensions space as the simplest model. >> >> But there are two kinds of two dimensions: the Euclidean ( 2D) space >> >> and Minkowski negative Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D space. >> >> What is possible to say about these systems ? >> >> Which reference frame can be taken as a basis of Existence ? >> >> # >> >> Euclidean ( 2D) reference frame belongs to a gravity space >> >> where space and time are two different substances. >> >> Minkowski negative Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D has no gravity >> >> and space and time are one and the same unite continuum. >> >> # >> >> Later Descartes changed Euclidean two dimensions into three >> >> dimensions . Living in this Descartes system of coordinate >> >> we try to understand : where did our existence come from ? >> >> Then, in my opinion, it is logically to take Minkowski negative >> >> Pseudo- Euclidian - 2D ( without gravity ) as the simplest model >> >> to have the searching answer. >> >> ============…. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
