---------- > From: Dexter Graphic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: EUGLUG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Eug-lug]Dan's text based computer system > Date: Sunday, December 15, 2002 9:03 AM > > For some reason Dan is unwilling to spend the necessary time > and effort to read the instructions and figure it out for > himself. For some reason no on else from EUGLUG is willing > to do this for him for free (as in beer).
Come on, I paid "someone from EUGLUG" already, several times (not much maybe by present standards, but a price he agreed on), for setting up a system, preferably without, but also with a GUI, and still no luck. And yes, I've put some time into it myself, as some of you may remember, but computers aren't everything in my life, as perhaps with some people. ("I could do great[er] things, if I wasn't so busy doing little things.") I don't often find instructions I'm sure are written in English. It often seems Linux people are more interested in trying new things than in getting time-tested things working well. Many command lines I see seem more like writing sub-routines instead of "commands". I also find quite a few things that even the "experts" can't figure out how to do. Why aren't many of these "compacted", using aliases and such? (That's something I hope to work on if I ever get Linux email going reasonably.) I still remember programs from CPM and DOS that had some advantages. Why such problems in Linux? Why no GUI? Most of the time they seem to me like great wasters of time, disk space and processing power. They may be easier to learn (if you have time to wade through the instructions for the non-intuitive parts), but I think, slower to actually use, which is what I prefer to do. My ideal is to never have to take my hands off home keys, at least when writing, giving commands, and most other things, except drawing and maybe diagramming. Of course to be complete, that would also require my own design of keyboard. I'll get back to ya. Dan Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Eugene OR 97401 http://www.efn.org/~danrob/ "Look not at what is and ask 'why'. look at what could be and ask 'why not'." - RFK? _______________________________________________ Eug-LUG mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.efn.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/eug-lug