On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Bruno Marchal <marc...@ulb.ac.be> wrote:
> > On 03 Aug 2016, at 21:01, Brent Meeker wrote: > > >> >> On 8/3/2016 7:26 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >>> >>> On 02 Aug 2016, at 20:52, Brent Meeker wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On 8/2/2016 6:15 AM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote: >>>> >>>>> It's not that it can't, but rather that it doesn't, and if it does >>>>> then that would require some extra physical explanation, a radio link >>>>> between brains or something. >>>>> >>>> >>>> That's what I mean by illegitimately appealing to physics while >>>> claiming that physics must be derived from computation of consciousness. >>>> >>> >>> Are you OK with Clark's answer to question 1? >>> What about question 2? >>> >> >> I've given up following your exchanges with Clark. They seem to be about >> semantics. >> > > It is enough to interpret "gibberish" by "I have no more argument". > > You can't fault people for not reading "gibberish" which you continue to entertain daily, as worthy of replies and full attention of the list for years. If they are gibberish why the years of daily replies in my inbox? Exchanges of friendship? I'm not sure friends talk to each other that way for years, where it remains unclear from both sides if there even is a real difference in between all the vain orgies of righteous hair splitting. To prove people stature and erudition? Regardless of the content, the guy entertaining gibberish, telling people to interpret it as "I have no argument" for him to consequently "have the real argument" doesn't paint the best picture. Blatant assumption of superiority in a context of supposedly rational exchange. Decidedly un-mystical and dogmatic from both of you. Both are using each other and the list for more self-promotion than discussion and should count themselves lucky to have each other, as both obviously fulfill each others' need. You could thank each other for providing yourselves with raison d'etre. That would be funny: a photo of you both having a beer instead of all the disguised rancour. For those that hope for some political or theological reference/orientation that comp may provide, look right here: this is merely human same old. Establishing and keeping a medieval pecking order, enforcing it with old tactics, fetishizing status and names => THIS is the theory of personal identity and the "scientific reasoning" it has always produced that Bruno points toward. Somebody indeed bring us a teleportation device. If anything the broader tendency here tarnishes possible points from any side as closer to advertising, forcing opinions with linguistic games etc. Welcome to the internet. PGC -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
