On 06 May 2017, at 21:06, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 5/6/2017 1:35 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Everett miss that his move forces him to derive the wave itself
from the superposition in arithmetic, and that is the weakness, OK.
Not OK. How does that "forces him to derive the wave itself from
the superposition in arithmetic".
What step in UDA don't you agree with?
I don't recall a step in the UDA referring to deriving the
Schroedinger wave function.
Because UDA shows that *the* correct physics must be derived. Indeed,
it shows that if the measure exists, physics becomes a theorem in
arithmetic. And if we can show that the measure does not exist, we
shows that mechanism cannot be correct.
Now, Schroedinger equation, or quantum physics, is very fundamental,
and is the first theory of physics lasting more than 15 years (it
lasts since more than a century, and we assume it when taking about
the current physics). So by "the correct, relatively to mechanism,
physics" is often replaced by "Schroedinger equation" in some context,
as a short-term.
Bruno
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
