https://www.space.com/wave-or-particle-ask-a-spaceman.html Is electron Wave or a Particle? It's Both, Sort Of. . " What's going on? Electrons are acting LIKE waves when they don't look anything like waves. What's doing the waving?" By Paul Sutter September 30, 2019 Paul M. Sutter is an astrophysicist at The Ohio State University, host of Ask a Spaceman and Space Radio, and author of "Your Place in the Universe." Sutter contributed this article to Space.com's Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights. "The electron consists of ten wave centers at its core, which are physical particles, but what is measured as the electron's energy or mass is its standing wave structure. Therefore, it has both particle and wave features. ....... In the 1920s, a young physicist named Louis de Broglie made a radical suggestion: Since light has energy, momentum and a wavelength, and matter has energy and momentum, maybe matter has a wavelength, too..... was de Broglie just horribly mistaken?"
everything-list@googlegroups.com<mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com> Subject: RE: Mixed State vs Superposition of States for Schrodinger's cat [Philip Benjamin] SORT OF !! Means wave-like not wavy particle. AS IF Logic, Not Bothe & Fallacy. Acting LIKE waves. Both electrons and photons have momentum. Features do not imply ontological properties. Wave centers at its core are physical particles, Electron microscope and photon microscope both are based on the BEHAVIOR [not BEING] of particles AS waves. There is a BIG difference between BEHAVIOR & BEING. de Broglie was not mistaken. He used the term wavelike. Mystics and occultists later substituted it with waviness. Einstein NEVER agreed with Bohr's interpretations based on Taoism. Wrath & anger are no solutions to ontological problems. All true sciences deal with epistemology, not ontology. Philip Benjamin CC. Space.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [Philip Benjamin] Wave equation? Of what? Wavy Particles? Or Wave-like Particles? Wavy particles is a paradox, a puzzle, a mystic mystery!! That is how a purely scientific theory such as Quantum Mechanics became so confounded with absurdities and speculations. Puzzle in, puzzle out!! There are and never can be wavicles, only particles that behave AS IF in wave forms. An AS IF Logic is all that is needed, not Both & Fallacy. The Schrodinger Cat was introduced only to show the absurdity of taking probability statistics seriously. Probabilities are not all possibilities. Some of these pioneers of QM were occultists, alcoholics and some other serious addictions. That is how the sorcerer-psychiatrist Carl Jung joined them. Worldviews determine scientific interpretations. Interpretations are not theories. CopenPagan Interpretation (a malaprop) is a pagan world-view, not scientific theory. That is how Albert Einstein strongly disagreed with Niels Bohr. Philip Benjamin Saturday, April 10, 2021 6:22 AM everything-list@googlegroups.com<mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Mixed State vs Superposition of States for Schrodinger's cat -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/SA0PR11MB4704E5760E8F4090CE74CE05A8729%40SA0PR11MB4704.namprd11.prod.outlook.com.
