On Tuesday, November 12, 2024 at 8:40:23 AM UTC-7 John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 8:22 AM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote: *>> I tried to explain that to you in a very long post. * > *TY, but you didn't explictly prove it, and that's why I didn't get it. It's in my to-do list. AG* *I proved that if the [COS (X)]^2 rule is true, and it's been tested for centuries and has been right every time, and if local hidden variables are the source of quantum weirdness * *then it's not just strange but LOGICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for Bell's Inequality to be violated. This would still be true even if tomorrow somebody finds a theory that was completely different from quantum mechanics but can still do everything quantum mechanics can do, and in addition do things that quantum mechanics can NOT do, such as explain what happens at the center of a Black Hole or at the first instance of the Big Bang; this is because this wonderful new theory would still have to be compatible with the **[COS (X)]^2 rule because experiment demands it, and experiment is king. * *The facts are that Bell's Inequality IS violated, therefore local hidden variables cannot be the source of quantum weirdness. * *I've asked this of Brent and awaiting his reply; what EXACTLY is weird? TY, AG * *John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>* nhv -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/97ed7495-278e-42c0-b9b2-c51c024c3de4n%40googlegroups.com.
