Matthew Willis wrote:
> I REALLY don't want working with the various formats I work with to
> become any harder than it already is. I do not want to sacrifice the
> ease of saying 'iso-2022-jp <file-reader>', 'shift-jis <file-reader>',
> and all the other adorable encodings japanese people like to use.
In the api that I'm proposing, the examples you give above still look like
this:
iso-2022-jp <file-reader>
shift-jis <file-reader>
How is that "harder" than the current api? It's in fact identical.
Ed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Factor-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/factor-talk
