--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ramana says that amness is local and will end.  Like the pot of water
> under the sea, when the pot is removed, the water inside and outside
> will be found to be the same no matter what the "pot thought" about
> water or how the pot thought about its own "potness defining
waterness."  
> 
> Individuality is form.  Form is destiny.
> 
> You dream a new self each night and then say bye-bye to such a
> construction each morning.  Nary a look back as such a former life.  
> 
> Just so death.  The form, the pot, that considered itself to "hold
> consciousness," is found to be "merely smug."  
> 
> Meat is born, meat dies. 
> 
> Meatlessness remains.

No problemo, if there is such a thing as 'meatlessness.'
Big if. Undeterminable.

> There is no "going to heaven" if heaven is all around all the time
> everywhere.  Tell any fish to go to water.  The meat robot either gets
> subtle enough in its processing to understand the true nature of
> freedom from identification, or not.  A realized robot knows that
> nothing material can symbolize immateriality, that dreams have no true
> substance that can be examined by a dream character scientifically,
> and that, when awakened, the robot understands the truth about dreams
> being illusory to the least titch.  

Problemo.

> Don't put your identification on that which moth and rust doth
> corrupt, right?  Put your money, instead, on, steady now, NOTHING.  

Big problemo.

This is the point of view taken by those who have
a need for consistency, for something to identify
with that is "countable on."

There is something *else* which is consistent and
"countable on." It's called change. 

There are many who feel that they can "put their
money on" BOTH that which is changeless AND that
which is ever-changing. BOTH are eternal, BOTH
are *equally* the Absolute. 

Tantra is the path of embracing BOTH the Absolute,
never-changing aspect of life AND the relative,
ever-changing aspect of life. If you believe in
a God, BOTH are equally God. If you don't, BOTH
are equally eternity and "countable on."

Some like to *believe* that preferring the never-
changing to the ever-changing is the "best bet."
But IMO it's really a process of REJECTING half
of life. Life has two sides. BOTH are "countable 
on," and BOTH are "good bets."

Tantra is a path for those who resonated with
MMY's original 200% of life. Preferring the Absolute
is for those who never believed it, and who always
felt that there was something "wrong" or "lesser"
about the relative. There isn't. There never was.





Reply via email to