--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One of my favorite dead horses I like to beat: > > Consciousness (pure) is not an observer. Giving it > this function implies a relationship to something (the > observed). All perception is of the mind. > Consciousness has nothing to do with mind. > Consciousness is not "located" anywhere. You can't > talk about consciousness other than in negating > relative constraints placed upon it by mind (i.e., not > this, not that). Does this make any sense?
Perfect sense. To me, at least, which may seem a bit nonsensical to some here. :-)
