> Don't tell me that you expecting scientific proof for existence of > Transcendental realty or God?
I would be interested to hear what you consider proof from any angle of a your preferred version of God's existence. Or is it all a matter of faith? I am always fascinated by how people construct this belief if you wouldn't mind sharing your POV. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Zoran Krneta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But you must be because seems that you don't believe in idea of unity! > > Any theory which aims to give explanation of everything, has to correlate > everything with everything. That's the reason why scientists believe in the > idea of unity and finally in idea of unity of consequences and matter. > > Statement like:" we're not interested in what a newspaper or magazine says, > after all this is the 21st century: we're just interested in papers > presented in respected, peer-reviewed journals ." does not sound very > intelligent looking from the spiritual side. > > Don't tell me that you expecting scientific proof for existence of > Transcendental realty or God? > > > 2008/1/10, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > On Jan 10, 2008, at 7:46 AM, Zoran Krneta wrote: > > > > Are you proponent of Madhavacharya dualism? > > > > > > > > No. Are you? > > > > > > >
