--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "george_deforest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > curtisdeltablues wrote: > > > > I got a lot of peace from the article in the Skeptical Inquirer > > in 89 or 90 that compared these personality traits with popular > > gurus... > > > > It explained how he could use and discard people as he unfolded > > his "mission." I don't see this as a putdown. > > > > One piece of evidence I submit that perhaps he was mislead about > > the power of his teaching are the closest people to him that he > > left behind, presumably his most advanced pupils. > > > > I think we have a pretty good idea that his optimism > > about his programs exceeded his results. > > Or is that just me being negative on King Tony and Bevan? > > King Tony always struck me as not really wanting the king job, > put playing along, just to keep M happy out of reverence. > Which means he might give up the crown soon, now that he can. > > But its Bevan im more worried about. > > Bevan's whole life has been as Maharishi's defender, kind of > like a cosmic body guard. But with M gone, Bevan might just > unravel and go bonkers. i hope im wrong, hope he can hang tough! > > i have had my own issues with Bevan, but i dont wish him ill.
I think Hagelin looks likes he's going to snap at any moment, that 'lecture' he gives by rote is getting thinner and thinner. I think he needs some new material! :-)
