--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity <no_re...@...> wrote: [...] > Pardon me. You both appear to have some insider knowledge about some > studies and both have made similar arguments. So I was curious if you > were him. I am not a mind reader so I asked. I certainly meant no > insult and I inquired via pm in any event. I've tired of all of the > back and forth so I won't bother to ask you to outline what you found > silly about my arguments. However, the one thing that bugged me about > both you and Tim Guy was the assumption, contrary to what was said by > the authors, that evidence in the last 20 years was ignored. They > only reported what they found relevant but they read all the studies. >
And you know this because,,,? ALthough, I'm told the authors are aware of the studies they omitted, but they won't discuss them because they don't have a theoretical framework to put them in and therefore they can't be of any value. Lawson
