--ooops I posted before I read all the listed...
Grand merci; many thanks for allowing me to live vicariously through you; enjoy Europe . I appreciate the mindset there, as opposed to America, the Puritans made dark what needn't be (my opinion) You , full of heart,enjoy... - In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "meowthirteen" <meowthirteen@> wrote: > > > > --- > > *Turquoise: > > How was your dinner? > > I bet it was lovely. > > I wonder if you ate outside,if the weather was gorgeous > > and what you had brought to you... > > I wonder if you had really nice wine with it. > > I hope you had good conversation and are having bella serah. > > It was great. Thanks for asking. I got to sit > in a lovely Provencal restaurant in Nice under > the stars and eat great food and drink good wine > with people who would have been bemused to the > point of uncontrollable laughter by all of the > prudery and sexual uptightness being discussed > on this forum as if it were important. :-) > > > *Speaking more to the post now,there is a forum on Craigslist > > called polymory and it explains more what it is .Visiting > > there on occasions will give a idea of what people in that > > lifestyle do/ think... > > Yep. I think that polyamory is an interesting > fascination (as opposed to the discussions here > about sex and sexuality, which could be taking > place between Puritans and Shiite Muslims as > far as I can tell). It's not particularly my > thing as it is a number of my friends' thing, > but I've learned much from their openness and > their willingness to treat sex and sexuality > as things that don't *require* rules, much less > the need to "obey" them. > > > -Personal side note-it's not what I thought,and there's a > > train of thought that was brought up there that some are > > wired this way. > > I'm going to keep this short,it could get deep .Psychology > > hypothesis, > > past life injury,fear,inadequate brain synapsis...list > > goes on infinately,as for why a participation in this > > type of relationship. > > I'm assuming you're still talking about polyamory. > So I find it curious that you only mention *negative* > hypotheses for why people might adopt it. I see a > number of positive ones. > > > I found it interesting the feelings the people shared involved. > > I like to understand as many as I can, so as to help me not judge . > > I think all are in the Process and I am working on letting > > everyone be at their own spot in the Process.I don't even have > > to understand. > > I just need to not cause suffering .I don't have all the answers, > > and I certainly have not heard them all either.I have so much > > more to hear, and understand,and not understand-and let go ,fly... > > > > *sprinkle * > > *sprinkle* > > Some mirth upon you - > > it got on your cheek! > > Ope!There goes a smile creeping up! > > Let the warmth of the day soak into you; > > it is not too hot > > Indeed. An openness to discussions of non-mainstream > sex and sexuality is IMO a great thing, and I praise > you for having that 'tude about it all. As you say, > no one has the answers. But on this forum you have a > number of people who *claim* to have the answers, one > way or another. I don't think that they do, and as I've > suggested this morning, the fact that *whatever* their > perspective on non-mainstream sexuality they consider > it a big enough deal to argue about *as if* they had > the answers the biggest "tell." > > They're still hung up about sex. Some on one side, > some on the other. > > I prefer my French friends and coworkers, who place > sex and sexuality in their true perspective, from my > point of view. That is, about on the same level as > what to order for dinner and which type of wine to > order. It's really not all that serious, people... >
