--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > > > (Except, of course, for the rules that keep other > > > > people from doing or saying what he'd rather they > > > > didn't do or say--that's why he's such a strong > > > > supporter of the posting limits.) > > > > > > Ah, the expected delayed result of me reminding > > > folks WHY we have posting limits here. :-) > > > > Says Barry, completely unable to respond to anything > > I've said except the one aside he quotes above. > > Says Judy, two posts from "posting out," less > than three days into the week. :-)
And once again Barry's not able to respond to what I wrote, this time in the post he's responding to. > What's fascinating is that she undoubtedly > believes that all these folks like Sal and > do.rflex and I who throw out an occasional > post designed to push her buttons and *get* > her to blow all her posts within a couple > of days DON'T HAVE to ever "respond to any- > thing she says." > > Why bother? We OWN her ass. We can make her > post out without ever interacting with her > directly at all. Meaning my posts exposing their lies and stupidities stand unrefuted. For some reason, Barry thinks this is a Good Thing for him and his dittoheads. (Actually, he's hoping his boast will discourage me from exposing him and the dunces. But it just gives me yet another opportunity to demonstrate what losers they are.) > Sal started things rolling this week with one > simple post that Judy felt so threatened by > that she spend almost a dozen posts "refuting" > it. Sal, on the other hand, just sat back and > allowed Judy to "refute" all she wanted to. More like a half dozen, actually. (Barry has counting problems.) > And Judy undoubtedly believed every time she > hit the Send button that she was "winning." :-) No, rather that Sal *lost*, big-time, every time I pressed the Send button. Let's remember what Sal claimed: that what I'd said about Obama fighting for the Defense of Marriage Act in court, with a brief that was as damaging as it could possibly be to gay rights, was my "insane fantasy" and that I was only able to find "fringe bloggers" to back me up. By "fringe bloggers," she meant *gay* bloggers, exposing her own homophobia--gays are just the "fringe," nobody who needs to be paid attention to. This was after I'd posted material from *Andrew Sullivan*, whose Atlantic Monthly blog is one of the two or three top blogs; and from *DailyKos*, one of the two or three top political blogs, which fanatically supported Obama. These were what Sal claimed were "fringe blogs." After having pointed that out, I posted a press release issued by the ACLU and the five top gay rights organizations in the country expressing their distress at Obama's actions. And finally, I posted links to ABC, CBS, and Huffington Post, along with links to several other A-list blogs. AP had a piece on Sunday that was published in newspapers across the country, and MSNBC had its own story, as well as the Village Voice and the Advocate. And Barry doesn't think Sal lost with her ignorant and homophobic remark. > And you know what the funniest thing will be? > > She won't be able to resist responding to this > post, either. Barry, dear, "predicting" that I "won't be able to resist" responding to one of your posts has never stopped me from doing so. It's possibly your *least* effective ploy (although none of them are very good). You just keep losing, and losing, and losing.
