--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > (Except, of course, for the rules that keep other > > > people from doing or saying what he'd rather they > > > didn't do or say--that's why he's such a strong > > > supporter of the posting limits.) > > > > Ah, the expected delayed result of me reminding > > folks WHY we have posting limits here. :-) > > Says Barry, completely unable to respond to anything > I've said except the one aside he quotes above.
Says Judy, two posts from "posting out," less than three days into the week. :-) What's fascinating is that she undoubtedly believes that all these folks like Sal and do.rflex and I who throw out an occasional post designed to push her buttons and *get* her to blow all her posts within a couple of days DON'T HAVE to ever "respond to any- thing she says." Why bother? We OWN her ass. We can make her post out without ever interacting with her directly at all. Sal started things rolling this week with one simple post that Judy felt so threatened by that she spend almost a dozen posts "refuting" it. Sal, on the other hand, just sat back and allowed Judy to "refute" all she wanted to. And Judy undoubtedly believed every time she hit the Send button that she was "winning." :-) And you know what the funniest thing will be? She won't be able to resist responding to this post, either.
