And, yeah, you guys out there, learn to fucking fuck will ya? If your partner isn't coming almost every time you make love, you ain't making love.
If the stats that report that most women are not coming from thrusting are true, (I think they are,) then why don't you men get jiggy with your ladies as to what their needs are and how to most pleasurably meet them? Talk about giving women the perfect right to complain; it's embarrassing to be a man just on the basis of these stats alone. WTF? And, just in case you men didn't actually know about it, there is a way to insure that a woman's clitoris is stimulated with every thrust, and your rate of helping your mate to orgasmic accomplishment rockets upwards. Not that clitoral stimulation is the only method or even the best method. And, you guys, wake the fuck up! Women are far more orgasmic than men -- shit, they can come just having their nips tweaked if they're deeply in love, and when something like that happens, a man is astoundingly aware of the importance of the fact that the woman's mind is the actual sex partner and that she can be "talked to" via any sensual input. Watch a woman read a Hallmark card -- she's swooning, and you dummy guys out there think you can't please her with actual touches and kisses and thrusty-thrust-thrusts? Women are built from the ground up to redline their chakras. If you can't find a way, barring some physical malady, it goes to the man's heart values IMO. If his energy isn't spot on, the woman will pick up on it every single time. If he's just knocking off a piece of ass, no wonder most women are not going to have an orgasm, right? Making love is making love. Merely having sex is exploring how human body parts can be tinker-toy connected. The good news: tinkering around is wonderful if making love is happening....adds to the pleasures. Edg --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex <no_re...@...> wrote: > > > > Listen, Moron, I am opposed to most male > > > thrusting - it serves no useful purposes > > > and it is disgusting and dangerous. > > > > Edg wrote: > > I'd say that Willy's contributions here have > > almost no value compared to Nab's fine > > service unto us all in which he keeps the > > concepts in focus... > > > So, you don't want to talk about the male > thrusting. That's understandable - you're > in a state of denial. You're addicted to the > thrusting - you've got to have it. Even if it > serves no useful purpose; even if it is living > dangerously; even if the thrusting brings no > satisfaction to the woman getting thrusted. > > Thrusting is a male ego thing, and men don't > really want to talk about it. But what I want > to know is, why do the women all think they > have to have the thrusting? > > So, listen, Moron, I am opposed to most male > thrusting - it serves no useful purposes and > it is disgusting and dangerous. >
