--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradh...@...> wrote: > > > On Nov 21, 2009, at 7:59 AM, do.rflex wrote: > > > It appears to me Vaj, that along with being an anti-Transcendental > > Meditation pseudo-scholar, you also turn out to be a hateful xenophobic > > bigot. > > LOL, that's your projection. I'm just an historical realist. > > > > > Any huge group of ANY religious ideology will be found with its fanatic and > > extremists - that would include the Christians and the Jews. > > I'd agree, in part. But not all religions are the same. Some are more > tolerant than others. > > > > > The obvious fact that you seem to eagerly and blindly ignore to feed your > > paranoid hateful bigotry is that the huge and vast and overwhelming > > majority of the members of these groups are peacable, law-abiding human > > beings with families who simply want to get along with their lives and have > > conflicts with no one. > > Like I said, I'm just a realist. The realities of life under majority Muslim > rule, as that happens in any country, are pretty well known. > > Suffice to say, Rachel wouldn't even be on TV in such a country, or she would > have been kidnapped or stoned to death by now--like the thousands and > thousands of working women in Iraq. Women's rights would cease to exist. > > > > > I would have thought that self-professed 'know-it-alls' like you would be > > intelligent enough to not be sucked into the anti-Isalm hysteria by the > > prevailing paid paranoia propagandists on the Fake Noise network like many > > ignorant, insecure people were by Joe McCarthy during the 'communist panic' > > era. > > I don't buy into the paranoia, I do know the history. > > Kashmir and the 350,000 pundit families that were forced to flee are a good > recent example. The genocide in Bangladesh, both which have occurred in our > lifetimes, is another good example. The loss of non-Muslim property and > access to a fair legal system in Bangladesh are living realities. > > > > > Apart from that - considering the Ft Hood shooter - in this country people > > are supposed to be afforded the rule of law - not mob lynching - which some > > of the obsessed hateful bigots would love to carry out. > > And of course I've never suggested any such thing. I'd like to see Nidal > Hasan receive a fair and balanced trial. > > > > > It hasn't been shown that he was part of any terrorist network. > > Nor did I suggest that he was. He was just acting on his own it appears, > inspired by others. > > > > > In any case the whole event is under intense investigation by the DOJ, the > > FBI and the Pentagon - and the actual facts will come out in court - under > > the rule of law. > > > > Apparently most Americans still DO have common sense - particularly after > > having been suckered into supporting BushCo's extensive propaganda > > fear-mongering and repeated lies about the great EVIL of Iraq - when it > > turns out that Saddam and in particular, the Iraqi people HAD NOTHING AT > > ALL TO DO WITH 9/11: > > Again, you're just ranting. I've always understood that Saddam and Iraq had > nothing to do with 9/11. This is just another of your non sequiturs. The > invasion of Iraq was a form of baiting which created one of the most > successful recruiting campaigns for religious extremism in human history--and > will for generations to come. > > You've just revealed yourself as a classic Boomeritis adherent, a > relativistic pluralist infected with narcissism. >
You're a fraud, Vaj. You're a fraud as a scholar and a fraud when it comes to defining Transcendental Meditation. Now you've also defined yourself as a hateful bigot who would steroetype 1.3 billion human beings as somehow "less then" the rest of humanity. You're actually doing readers here a favor in discrediting your integrity and authenticity by revealing yourself in this way.
