--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Hugo" <fintlewoodlewix@> wrote:
> > 
> > A rather irritating Guardian journalist goes in search of inner
> > peace.....
> 
> Why irritating? I enjoyed this. Some very funny bits. The
> Buddha statue in the shrine "for some reason reminds me of
> a very small football fan"--I don't see it myself from the
> photo, but it's an engaging image. I also liked "I am in
> danger of turning into a rug."
> 
> (Question: How does a pot of stew manage to explode??
> Maybe she was using a pressure cooker and the vent was
> clogged?)

I'm thinking clay pot cooking.  Stew assembled ahead of time, cooled in fridge 
then put right on the burner...boom!  I love clay pot cooking but you have to 
respect the physics.  




> 
> > http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2010/apr/08/tanya-gold-meditation
> > <http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2010/apr/08/tanya-gold-meditatio\
> > n>
> > 
> > From my own experience I'll say that TM does not prevent
> > anger, there are no shortage of stroppy, short fused people
> > in the TMO. The only reason I don't count myself among
> > there number is that I retain a bit of self awareness and
> > can hold it back until I've rationalised whether someone
> > deserves a good kicking or not.
> > 
> > In fact it was one of the great surprises to me that TM made
> > me very angry indeed and quite a lot of the time, last thing
> > I expected given the literature.
> 
> FWIW, only time I experienced anger related to TM was
> finding myself a bit touchy right after doing my TM-Sidhis
> program. I extended my rest afterward for about 10
> minutes, and that went away.
> 
> <snip> 
> > Maybe TM is unsuitable for some people and we'd be better
> > off doing a different, less fraught, type.
> 
> Don't know how TM could be considered "fraught." It might
> well bring out fraughtness in *people* who are fraught,
> though. Did you ever try resting longer afterward? Sorry,
> I know that's the TM party line, but it worked for me.
>


Reply via email to