--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wgm4u" <wgm4u@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, blusc0ut <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall <thomas.pall@> wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > > > > "No effort on this path is every wasted" -- Krishna,
> > > > > > *Bhagavad Gita*
> > > > 
> > > > "No effort is wasted because no effort is used!" -MMY
> > > > commentary.
> > > 
> > > That's a good one, very smart. Actually no effort is ever
> > > used, as there is no doer :-)
> > 
> > That's the bottom line.
> > 
> > And disagreement here about "no doer" is the source of
> > the disagreement about the effortlessness of TM. That
> > never occurred to me before, but you've nailed it.
> > 
> > In that sense, TM gives you the clear experience of
> > "no doer" --if you're open to it.
> > 
> > If you're not open to it, if you're a control freak,
> > you will probably always find that TM requires "effort."
> 
> TM is just a different process which uses a passive approach to achieving TC. 
> IN TM the reduction of metabolic rate is a bi-product of the mind settling 
> down, 



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wgm4u" <wgm4u@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, blusc0ut <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall <thomas.pall@> wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > > > > "No effort on this path is every wasted" -- Krishna,
> > > > > > *Bhagavad Gita*
> > > > 
> > > > "No effort is wasted because no effort is used!" -MMY
> > > > commentary.
> > > 
> > > That's a good one, very smart. Actually no effort is ever
> > > used, as there is no doer :-)
> > 
> > That's the bottom line.
> > 
> > And disagreement here about "no doer" is the source of
> > the disagreement about the effortlessness of TM. That
> > never occurred to me before, but you've nailed it.
> > 
> > In that sense, TM gives you the clear experience of
> > "no doer" --if you're open to it.
> > 
> > If you're not open to it, if you're a control freak,
> > you will probably always find that TM requires "effort."
> 
> TM is just a different process which uses a passive approach to achieving TC. 
> IN TM the reduction of metabolic rate is a bi-product of the mind settling 
> down, doesn't mean TM is the ONLY correct meditation system.
> 
> In other systems where they use Dharana or Concentration the mind and *will* 
> are used *actively* to do the same thing. Some think Dharana is superior 
> because it does give the practitioner 'conscious' control of the process. In 
> TM you are subject to the vagaries of the nervous system (sleep, etc.).
> 
> "Spending two hours concentrating on the eye-focus each day will help our
> attention withdraw from the body. Generally our sensory currents which give us
> sensation of this physical world are spread out through the body. As we
> concentrate at the seat of the soul, the sensory currents start withdrawing 
> from
> our extremities. They come up from our feet and legs to our trunk. Eventually
> they are totally concentrated at the seat of the soul. Once at that point, a
> vista of divine Light and celestial Sound opens up for us."
> 
> Sant Mat description of Dharana.
>

There's an assumption that this process leads to something worthwhile.

> doesn't mean TM is the ONLY correct meditation system.

Doesn't mean it isn't, either.

> 
> In other systems where they use Dharana or Concentration the mind and *will* 
> are used *actively* to do the same thing. Some think Dharana is superior 
> because it does give the practitioner 'conscious' control of the process. In 
> TM you are subject to the vagaries of the nervous system (sleep, etc.).
> 
> "Spending two hours concentrating on the eye-focus each day will help our
> attention withdraw from the body. Generally our sensory currents which give us
> sensation of this physical world are spread out through the body. As we
> concentrate at the seat of the soul, the sensory currents start withdrawing 
> from
> our extremities. They come up from our feet and legs to our trunk. Eventually
> they are totally concentrated at the seat of the soul. Once at that point, a
> vista of divine Light and celestial Sound opens up for us."
> 
> Sant Mat description of Dharana.
>

There's an assumption that this process leads to something worthwhile.


Lawson


Reply via email to