--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <drpetersutphen@...> wrote: > > There is only a non-doer when there "is" a non-doer. When > this is the condition then there is the dharma of non-doing. > Prior to this there is a doer and the dharma associated with > a doer.
My contention is that there is never a non-doer. There is only the subjective perception of "non-doing" or "not the doer." Perception doesn't make it so. As someone who occasionally treats crazy people, you should know that. :-)
