--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, blusc0ut <no_reply@> wrote: <snip> > > As long as activity is there, even very subtle, there will > > be the witness, also very subtle. If there is no awareness > > during the experience of anything, you'll have to refer to > > the 'outward stroke' of meditation, to know about it. > > Right. > > > In my experience, you don't need the outward stroke, to be > > aware of it. > > To be aware of what? By (TM) definition, to be aware > *of* anything *is* the outward stroke.
Or the inward stroke, obviously! In context, we were talking about whether one could be aware *of* anything during TC-by-itself, including that one *was* in TC-by- itself, until TC-by-itself ceases and the outward stroke begins.
