--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "futur.musik" <futur.musik@> wrote: <snip> > > > So if someone appears dishonest, or contrary or fearful to us, > > > it is merely a difference in awareness, and no deliberate > > > attempt at deception or obfuscation. > > > > I don't think I buy that with regard to honesty. Surely > > differences in awareness account for whether a person > > believes there is *justification* for saying something > > they know to be false, but you really can't make much > > of a case that nobody ever attempts to deceive others. > > So true: > > Judy:(In a post where she repeatedly accused me of being > unethical!) > > The only ploy Curtis has to > > rebut this uncomfortable fact is the claim, which he's > > made in other posts, that I brainwashed all of them into > > concurring with me, > > > Definitely more of a consciously lying thing than just a > difference in awareness.
Right. I think you were consciously attempting to deceive and believed it was justified (just as Barry does when *he* attempts to perpetrate that deception): "I agree that Judy has set the agenda for this angle and I have to give credit for her forceful personality that so many have taken up this perspective. (And yes I know it is possible that everyone just came to this conclusion independently, but I don't find this as likely.)" That's Curtis, responding to a post in which Barry said: *No one else* ever had > any doubts about Vaj's TM "pedigree" until she started > her "Gotta find a way to demonize Vaj so no one will > believe him when he makes valid points" campaign. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/302040
