For anyone interested in the complexities of orchestral seating plans, there's an excellent book by Daniel J. Koury: "Orchestral Performance Practices in the Nineteenth Century" (UMI Research Press, ISBN O-8357-2051-9). It's true that the 1st and 2nd violins were mostly seated on opposite sides, but this was not a hard and fast rule. Norman Del Mar's "Anatomy of the Orchestra" (Faber + Faber, ISBN 0-571-11552-7) also gives useful information. Regarding the idea that the 2nds will be at a disadvantage when seated with the instruments tilted away from the audience, Del Mar says: "Yet the apparent loss of tone is an illusion since, like all matters of balance, it is instinctively rectified by the players; whereas on the contrary a certain variation of timbre can indeed be detected and must surely be a positive gain."

Michael Cook

At 18:47 -0400 12/06/2003, David H. Bailey wrote:
When somebody got the foolish notion that the direction the violin is facing actually impacts the sound the audience hears.

In the opposites seating, the 2nd violins are facing the rear of the stage, so if you hold with the directional-sound bit, it would be counterproductive to seat them that way.

The cellos, of course, face front, so their sound is more directed at the audience, and the violas are at enough of a slant and their role is usually subservient enough in the score that having them angled as they are doesn't really diminish their sound.

Personally, I prefer the opposites seating -- it really makes contrapuntal passages come alive in my mind. Having 1sts and 2nds all next to each other simply muddies the sound, all those fiddles slightly out of phase with each other!
_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to