On 17 Jan 2007 at 14:46, Johannes Gebauer wrote:

> On 17.01.2007 David W. Fenton wrote:
> > And, of course, why would Bach have copied ripieno parts, or parts
> > indicating solo/ripieno for a performance he knew would not have
> > anything but solo singers?
> 
> Well, would he have written that very same piece had he know he would
> have a larger choir?

I don't know. But that's not actually the question, is it?

> Interestingly in the whole of the B minor mass there is not a single
> solo or ripinieno indication of any type in any of the original
> manuscripts. I must say that a performance of the Kyrie fugue with 5
> singers is imo much more powerfull than any performance by a large
> choir (even the Thomas Choir).
> 
> We are now turning in circles. In Bach's oevre there are cantatas
> which were intended for solistic performance only (only one set of
> voice parts, and no indication whatsoever of solo or ripieno passages,
> ergo (simplified) one singer per part), and the larger cantatas where
> ripieno parts exist. These were typically performed by 8 singers (like
> the John Passion): 4 soloists, and 4 ripienists.
> 
> Please don't mix these two types, or the whole discussion is useless.
> Joshua Rifkin _never_ said that Bach's cantatas were all intended for
> single voices, he knows the distinction between ripieno and solo
> better than anyone else.

I'm not using solo/ripieno as an indication of non-one-on-a-part. 
Rifkin's argument was that two people didn't share a part, and that 
when there was solo/ripieno division, there was a part for the 
soloist and a part for the ripienist. That's still one on a part in 
Rifkin's interpretation, and I've been treating it as such in my 
discussions of the situation.

> The problem is that this whole discussion has become a "single voices
> against big choir" discussion. This was never started by Joshua.

If what I've written gives you the idea that I see it that way, I've 
written unclearly.

-- 
David W. Fenton                    http://dfenton.com
David Fenton Associates       http://dfenton.com/DFA/

_______________________________________________
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Reply via email to