* Jonathan Wagner -- 11/3/2008 3:34 PM: > The second thing to consider is that can pull in individual > libraries as dependencies (i.e, only the Random, Hash and GIL libraries) > rather than requiring _all_ of boost.
Sure. I think most people knew this. But I assume it's very unlikely that anyone has only some libs of boost installed. You either have it (all of it), or you don't. So a dependency on only a few libs doesn't really make us less dependent. And *if* we accept the dependency (which seems to be as good as decided), then we can also use more of its libs without making the situation any "worse". m. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel