On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 22:13:18 +0100 "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <enrico.weig...@gr13.net> wrote: > > Cool. Do you now see why I am sceptical of the patches that I have > > been labelling "microoptimizations"? > > Might be true for an individual one. But in the end that all sums up.
Not in my testing. FTR I did give your tile visibility patch two rounds of overnight tests. The first one locked up, so I doubt your locking removal is 100% safe. I then tried a simplified version that just replaced the tile array with a bitset. There was no measurable difference in speed. > OTOH, I dont care anymore, as nobody here doesn't seem to care either. > I'll just maintain my own branch and wont bother the folks here with > my patches anymore. Your choice. I remain concerned that there is a serious bug that is causing a bad slowdown that I am not seeing. Cheers, Mike Pope
pgpHjL15R96ZO.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Freecol-developers mailing list Freecol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freecol-developers
