Hi Johnson,

> But the DOSBOX is famous, and lot of "stupid people" use it for games.
> Both are FREE software, why didn't people fire up FreeDOS? The point
> is easier to start a DOSBOX in Windows than a REAL DOS.

Fortunately, not all people share this opinion. For example, I
downloaded and installed FreeDOS, because I weren't satisfied with
DOSBox. Major games runs so slowly in it, even if I set the cycles and
frameskips high. Now I need to get a SoundBlaster to get the sound
work, but it's another story...

Restarting the system to boot a real DOS is inconvenient, but if you
do so, you probably get a better quality.

> If FreeDOS proved "not as good" as DOSBOX, any meaning of that?

Personally, I don't agree this. I hope I'm not alone with it.

As I see, there are many FreeDOS users though - then why is it a waste
of time, when people are using it?

Regards,
MegaBrutal

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Reply via email to