Hi Johnson, > But the DOSBOX is famous, and lot of "stupid people" use it for games. > Both are FREE software, why didn't people fire up FreeDOS? The point > is easier to start a DOSBOX in Windows than a REAL DOS.
Fortunately, not all people share this opinion. For example, I downloaded and installed FreeDOS, because I weren't satisfied with DOSBox. Major games runs so slowly in it, even if I set the cycles and frameskips high. Now I need to get a SoundBlaster to get the sound work, but it's another story... Restarting the system to boot a real DOS is inconvenient, but if you do so, you probably get a better quality. > If FreeDOS proved "not as good" as DOSBOX, any meaning of that? Personally, I don't agree this. I hope I'm not alone with it. As I see, there are many FreeDOS users though - then why is it a waste of time, when people are using it? Regards, MegaBrutal ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
