Hi Kayle

you would run recon-all on the RMS, then run the dura stuff posthoc.

cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 
9 May 2013, Kayle Sawyer wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Can the MEMPRAGE be specified in recon-all with the -i flag? We have been 
> using the MEMPRAGE RMS scans and discarding the multiecho scans. If we 
> instead specify the multiecho scans for recon-all, do we need to give any 
> additional parameters (e.g. the number of echoes) for it to utilize the 4 
> echoes to detect dura and refine pial surfaces in mris_make_surfaces, as 
> described below? Or would we have to run recon-all with the RMS, then after 
> it finishes re-run mris_make_surfaces manually with the -dura flag to refine 
> the pial surface?
>
> Also, I'd like to make sure we are using dcmunpack properly. We take the 
scan.info file and parse it like this: "-run [MEMPRAGE_4e_p2_1mm_iso run 
number] 3danat mgz 001.mgz" so the multi echo scan gets put into one mgz 
file, and the RMS gets put into a separate mgz file.
>
> Thanks,
> -Kayle
>
> On May 9, 2013, at 12:00 PM, freesurfer-requ...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
>> Message: 35
>> Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 10:44:23 -0400 (EDT)
>> From: Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Working with MEMPRAGE
>> To: Jonathan Holt <whats...@umich.edu>
>> Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> Message-ID:
>>      <alpine.lrh.2.02.1305091043500.13...@gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
>>
>> it needs to be:
>>
>> mris_make_surfaces -dura memprage_echo%d.mgz 4 subjid lh
>>
>> note the "4" which tells it how many echoes to read
>>
>> On Thu, 9 May 2013, Jonathan Holt wrote:
>>
>>> I input:
>>>
>>> mris_make_surfaces -dura memprage_echo%d.mgz subjid lh
>>>
>>> it returns:
>>>
>>> detecting dura using 0 echos from memprage_echo%d.mgz
>>>
>>>
>>> Should I execute the command in the same directory as the mgz's? Should 
>>> they be set up or placed in a specific directory? I also, as with 
>>> recon-all, exported the proper subject directory beforehand.
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 9, 2013, at 10:37 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
>>>
>>>> can you send me the full command line? It should say 4 echoes, not 0
>>>> On Thu, 9 May 2013, Jonathan Holt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Bruce,
>>>>>
>>>>> should the hemisphere's be processed separately, or how do I signify lh 
>>>>> and rh simultaneously?
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, should the fact that after running mris_make_surfaces, it says 
>>>>> "detecting dura using 0 echos from memprage_echo%d.mgz" be worrisome? 
>>>>> I've got 4 different echos, all mgzs in the directory. I have a feeling 
>>>>> I'm doing this incorrectly.
>>>>>
>>>>> jon
>>>>> On May 9, 2013, at 8:50 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Jon
>>>>>>
>>>>>> yes, the subject and hemi need to be defined (they are required 
>>>>>> parameters)
>>>>>> Bruce
>>>>>> On Wed, 8 May 2013, Jonathan Holt wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>> combed through the mail archives to figure out how to work with multi 
>>>>>>> echo
>>>>>>> mprage, found what I need but I wanted to confirm which of these two
>>>>>>> commands is the appropriate
>>>>>>> mris_make_surfaces -dura memprage_echo%d.mgz 4 subjid lh/rh
>>>>>>> mris_make_surfaces -dura memprage_echo%d.mgz do the subjid and 
>>>>>>> hemispheres need to be specified as per the 1st line?
>>>>>>> jon
>>>>>>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to