The important thing is that there is still an enduring addiction.

From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> On Behalf Of Eric Charles
Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 6:00 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] lurking

Lol.... ok.... but also there are plenty of Casino's available with no 
smoking.... Welcome to The Future.



On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 8:32 PM Frank Wimberly 
<wimber...@gmail.com<mailto:wimber...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Remind me never to go to a casino.  The last time I was in one was to meet my 
lawyer whose office was in ABQ for lunch so we could split the driving time.  I 
almost choked from the cigarette smoke.
---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505

505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021, 6:09 PM Prof David West 
<profw...@fastmail.fm<mailto:profw...@fastmail.fm>> wrote:
SteveS,

Your intuitions are spot on, based on my experience. Although casinos can't ban 
cell phones, you may not use one at the table - must step away and not have a 
hand in play. The do detect and ban all kinds of electronic transmissions — 
radio to infrared and if you have such a transmitter on your person you are 
quickly escorted out and banned. Receivers are harder to detect except when 
actively 'receiving' but same result if discovered.

Blackjack has a published 'standard game' written up years ago — casinos will 
actually give you a copy — that maximizes the players odds of winning, at least 
long term. However there are lots of tricks employed to remove even that 
vestige of a chance, like mandatory side bets, and paying even odds instead of 
3/2 for a blackjack if your bet is below some minimum.

Casinos are also masters of facial recognition — probably better tech than 
anything any government (including China) or Facebook can command. Once banned, 
even hookers, you will never get more than a few feet into a big casino before 
security descends — even if disguised.

Cash game poker, the house takes a standard rake — 10% up to a limit — of the 
pot as table rent and dealers receive tips plus a minimum wage hourly rate. 
Seniority determines which dealers get to service the high limit (hence high 
tips) tables.

Tournaments: house takes a portion of the entry fee and rest goes into pot. 
Dealers get hourly rate, plus tips are collected from winners and distributed 
evenly.

Poker is luck plus very astute inter-personal observation. One of my favorite 
players, Daniel Negreanu, has a Master Class that provides all kinds of 
technical skill, but he does not play that way, instead seat of the pants 
observations and table talk determine his strategy. Not that he is unaware of 
or lacks the technical chops, they are just not the ultimate arbitrator of play 
— mostly because all the others in tournaments at his level have the same 
degree of technical skill.

I did some consulting to casinos a few years back when Highlands was trying to 
start a casino / hospitality program. I have never seen such sophisticated and 
secure systems before or since.

James Swain has a series of mystery books — first in series is Grift Sense — 
with plots that center on one major attempt to defraud a casino and many little 
side plots that reveal all the different attempts to "cheat" casinos. Fun reads.

A strategy for short term winning at roulette: bet 10 each on two of the 1/3 
sections of the table (rows or columns) plus one of the 1:1 sections (even/odd, 
red/black, top half-bottom have of the board), plus 1 dollar on the 0-00 line 
(half odds but both covered).  However, this will not work if you play more 
than a 10-15 minutes because it only takes 4.5 times when none of your bets hit 
before you are wiped out. This apparently works because the wheel DOES have a 
bias, mostly from the way the dealer sends the ball around the wheel. Watch the 
history board for patterns that reveal the ever so slight but real bias.

davew


On Mon, Nov 8, 2021, at 3:51 PM, Steve Smith wrote:

DaveW-

Congratulations (or condolences) on your move to Vegas.  Another reference gave 
me the sense you might be at least *wintering* there.

I probably would not be surprised (though shocked) by what Casinos can ban.  I 
didn't mean to suggest that they didn't have the self-granted authority to ban 
cell phones, etc.  but rather doing so would severely impact their popularity 
among the hordes of marks who happily come to give up their spare (or not so) 
cash to feed the bright lights and other egregious displays of wealth.

The Thomas Bass rendition of Farmer et alia foray into exploiting 
manufacturing/wear biases in roulette wheels  Eudamonic 
Pie<https://www.thomasbass.com/the_eudaemonic_pie_1360.htm> suggests that today 
the same effort would be "trivial" with nothing more perhaps than a cell phone 
camera/computer observing from a shirt pocket.    Of course, those biases have 
long since been ameliorated one way or another I am sure.

You describe poker tables as the one place the house has no stake in the game.  
I have to admit that i don't know who pays the rent/real-estate on the table?  
Is there a flat-rate rake-off from every pot?  Does the dealer live on tips?

When the Native Casinos opened here, my elderDotter was turning 18 and she had 
a friend who thought she wanted to grow up to be a blackjack dealer so they 
frequented the casino.  I don't know that my daughter lost/spent much money on 
it, but she never had any illusions that she could "beat the house".   I think 
their game was blackjack which I understand has the built-in tiny but positive 
bias to the house (the house wins all ties by convention?).   I told both 
daughters as they approached college that I had saved enough for them to be 
able to go through a BS/BA degree with only part-time/summer work contribution 
(or healthy scholarship) on their part.   I suggested that I cash it out and 
take it to the casino and drop it all on red or black (Roulette) with the 
understanding that their odds ware just a smidge short of doubling their money 
vs losing it all (the one green slot represents the house advantage?).  The 
conceit was that if they *won* they would then have enough cash to "coast" 
through college as *many* of their peers seemed to be supported or else if they 
*lost* they could forego any implied obligation of going to college.   They 
both honestly mulled it for at least 10 seconds before they rolled their eyes 
and said "no way!".

I'm curious how you feel about my claim that the inter-personal dynamic at the 
poker table is in some sense more important than the technical skill?  My point 
in your case would be that you would be *at* a table where the technical skill 
level was roughly even, right?   Tournament play tends to support that, right?  
 As you advance, the skill level of your table-peers increases until you either 
step up YOUR game or fail out of the game?

I think of you as having a strong mix of technical approach, intuition, and 
likely to engage in the social-emotional game as well (e.g. bluffing).

- Steve
On 11/8/21 9:42 AM, Prof David West wrote:
You would be surprised at what casinos can ban. Maybe even more surprised at 
the, not necessarily AI, software tools they use to analyze video feeds and 
pounce on any kind of statistically improbabilities. Most casinos in Vegas have 
tools, like mandatory side bets with very low odds, that erase the near equal 
odds of blackjack.

The only 'safe' gambling is poker where the house has no direct interest in the 
outcome.

As DES stated, winning is a matter of patience and losing antes only, until you 
get good hand and then skill of playing that hand for maximum return — playing 
less worse than the others at the table.

I am living in Vegas now and playing small tournaments fairly regularly.

davew


On Sun, Nov 7, 2021, at 7:23 PM, Steve Smith wrote:


On 11/7/21 12:02 PM, David Eric Smith wrote:
There must be some kind of “Back to the future” movie that can be made out of 
this.  Doyne Farmer in Vegas all over again, but with current-era AI in place 
of toe-operated computers.

Yah!  Surely Casinos can't begin to restrict computers(phones)/earbuds, etc.  
on the gaming floor.

Strange coincidence that my sister went to Kindergarten with Vance Packard 
(Norm's brother) in Silver City long before they all became eagle scouts and 
then the Chaos Cabal.  We moved away the next year and I doubt I ever met any 
of them back then.   I came to LANL just before (I think) Doyne came... I seem 
to remember that Norm was there for a summer...  and soon came the (in)famous 
CA conference...   As I remember it the game of interest (aside from Life, what 
with Conway in attendance) was GO with a lot of speculation about the 
implications of local vs global "intelligence"...   I was intrigued by HashLife 
and it's implications for finding structure at many scales... I still hope for 
someone with more follow-through than I have to implement a more redundant but 
"thorough" space-time decomposition (an N-1xN-1 kernel over the 4 positions at 
each "zoom" level).

Regarding poker.. I played some low-stakes in college and saw there were two 
things to take in:   the main technical skill was to simply play less poorly 
than the other players at the table and that was entirely overshadowed by the 
social-engineering games of bluffing, etc.   The very simple game-theoretic 
aspect of not depleting your own stake before you catch a "lucky streak" going 
your way was also a good understanding.   I played with my "boss" and a number 
of peers at the time and realized that it was more about jockeying for position 
at work and drinking beer than it was about winning/losing.  I think the most I 
ever lost/won was on the order of $20-$40 which in those days was roughly 1-2 
shifts wages... a LOT if I joined them weekly... too rich for my blood!  I 
still feel that *technically* playing well really means just playing less 
badly.   Blackjack being even more obviously so?

Yikes.



On Nov 7, 2021, at 1:56 PM, Marcus Daniels 
<mar...@snoutfarm.com<mailto:mar...@snoutfarm.com>> wrote:

My inclination would be to invest in standoff biometrics (e.g. Eulerian Video 
Amplification) and then find the best poker playing code.   It ought to be 
possible to automate and perhaps get rich in the process.

From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com<mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com>> On 
Behalf Of Eric Charles
Sent: Sunday, November 7, 2021 7:42 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 
<friam@redfish.com<mailto:friam@redfish.com>>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] lurking

I DID read all the thread so far... but I'm curious how we got to one of the 
starting points: "as cringy as it may be for some dork to be proud of their 
Poker prowess"

I am somewhat satisfied with my Poker mediocrity, certainly not proud of it... 
but if I met someone who was ACTUALLY startlingly better than I am, and they 
were proud of that, I wouldn't find it cringy. (Ditto in my other hobbies, like 
Aikido.)

I guess if I met someone who had a slight edge in their drunk-buddy home games, 
and they were super proud of THAT, then i would find it cringy. (Ditto someone 
who's the best Aikido student in their small dojo, but who's obviously not more 
than that.)

When I see academic work on game theory, it's usually of lower quality than 
what the good poker players are doing these days. Mastering the game is crazy 
hard, and being able to sit down and implement a coherent and winning strategy 
for 40-80 hours a week is not easy. So... why would that be cringe?



On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 1:42 PM Marcus Daniels 
<mar...@snoutfarm.com<mailto:mar...@snoutfarm.com>> wrote:
Ok, part of the story is knowing what is really needed for reproducibility as a 
function of context.
With that, then there's the matter of how much control is afforded.   Is it 
programmable in predictable ways?

-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com<mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com>> On 
Behalf Of u?l? ?>$
Sent: Wednesday, November 3, 2021 8:20 AM
To: friam@redfish.com<mailto:friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] lurking

Yeah, I agree. But context is Queen. When the virus is created in the lab, it's 
done with real stuff distilled from the soupy world. Given enough of a 
difference in context, the robot may not be able to re-constitute the life 
because the soupy world surrounding the robot doesn't have the real stuff 
required. Such drastic context changes could be a result of translation through 
space or time. E.g. trying to construct, on Mars, an organism read/serialized 
on earth. Or e.g. trying to construct an organism read millennia ago, millennia 
in the future. It's naive to talk about "science" as if any given read-out 
formula thereby expressed is *complete*. Science is abstraction to a large 
extent ... maybe not as abstracting as math, of course. And science must remain 
"open" precisely because any formula it expresses is suspect, perhaps 
incomplete.

My favorite example is the magic brewing stick: 
https://medievalmeadandbeer.wordpress.com/2019/05/04/scandinavian-yeast-logs-yeast-rings/
 It *was* scientific to lay out the magic stick as a critical element of the 
brewing process, only to discover later that the stick isn't the important part.

On 11/2/21 2:39 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> Even if that were so, viruses have been pulled from history or tweaked and 
> created in the lab.   So we have a design specification, and the means to 
> make it.    One could imagine a robot fabricating the close-to-the-metal 
> machine too.   There is a story one can write down how it is done.   If there 
> is no story, it is not science we are talking about, it is something else.


--
"Better to be slapped with the truth than kissed with a lie."
☤>$ uǝlƃ


.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  
bit.ly/virtualfriam<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam>
un/subscribe 
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,zW4gfnCEw-aapRghh7ny5t03MK3Rq3qBzZPN7MbtdXMnfOx5f1a4BOQ_kZjD5TYhhqAHjIi_GHC0cpNID7QmaQdIJEXPdJvp7e2YSj9T-Q,,&typo=1>
FRIAM-COMIC 
http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,42WSfvOtpfV6Y4enUg6wuYty46Wym2X7PyXyWfqyenKLBcLVwb23M3brrQe1Ygpnu_evLvZtxEK7bFkcshitkPmAQPpH4xkXwt8LCX6FnP03&typo=1>
archives:
 5/2017 thru present 
https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fpipermail%2ffriam_redfish.com%2f&c=E,1,iXEKOh_9svoFHHsCWA0TbwlILOY3IsE9XdwRauUf8WPQ2GKKbDvhQxuC-IF8qq3KWrXqLIrNxnxVLUtsqex7IJejGUSNsMIb8RUoRuriAA,,&typo=1>
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  
bit.ly/virtualfriam<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam>
un/subscribe 
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,xOjquKj_8PwgYgPetFZ4iffchk0Hsdj7KqKj_7lgxEu0hJ4JKtFeVvWGlSzPBqsqqlGfsC7QC4-6YEI60Sn8KQ-dv4hRIYgns3yIkdh09Q,,&typo=1>
FRIAM-COMIC 
http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,OtAeUIEXCxUwWlqYdvcpIascVLmMUGFiI0gBRxXqVzPmRDbvz5UW-aBrVg13FiWo3wnj2yGqP2_WzOFRCT60GYXt-MJh8V2srmxRoK5gQ60,&typo=1>
archives:
 5/2017 thru present 
https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fpipermail%2ffriam_redfish.com%2f&c=E,1,LsKAo_HeNNvVn8e0cDxtHSeLoR3npW-8RPv-a1uTz8vlkpY2g2ckzynNVrsHBLDwefpJafaKIGFZoge5o85zAT3C5I3LbGDSN7M2EA8NsSwMyPY8YbRj&typo=1>
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  
bit.ly/virtualfriam<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam>
un/subscribe 
https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,_BlHnyrN4CBEuprXVVy7f_mq3Z-tTWnNTUoEVL2wFjffa3W39HZm7739L-ersuH4jGwn4lOKTAQ0a8LW3Rpg5oX0xA-uGCnMO6QYqE4KE3dZO3-wLhX5WWwF7A4,&typo=1
FRIAM-COMIC 
https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,t2v4djJabF5YoxHP9TWOogbl_lizkTlBDrWNSYFDyFQc2oEqq-ghR0tsH7hnRt9tZjI3-MOOrEuLks0GJ9lideLCkCUiGBWRpBsaKIPTaH5r1tdRiQGZ4_qgkg,,&typo=1
archives:
5/2017 thru present 
https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fpipermail%2ffriam_redfish.com%2f&c=E,1,1HwvCHzBMHc9q8dL9FwTD6thlBDdmw7i9bSUZebmdoy7AlNV8bl5Inpn6PlDWdxaOG1_3wNax5YCtb2P3_Ct_dVSvtqcKX0fU7ehAs56Y-D2MA,,&typo=1
1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/



.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv

Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  
bit.ly/virtualfriam<http://bit.ly/virtualfriamun/subscribe>

un/subscribe<http://bit.ly/virtualfriamun/subscribe> 
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/

archives:

 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/

 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/





.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  
bit.ly/virtualfriam<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam>
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:
5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/




.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv

Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  
bit.ly/virtualfriam<http://bit.ly/virtualfriamun/subscribe>

un/subscribe<http://bit.ly/virtualfriamun/subscribe> 
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/

archives:

 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/

 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/



.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  
bit.ly/virtualfriam<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam>
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:
5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/



.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  
bit.ly/virtualfriam<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam>
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:
 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  
bit.ly/virtualfriam<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam>
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:
 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:
 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to