On 11/8/21 6:31 PM, Frank Wimberly wrote:
Remind me never to go to a casino.  The last time I was in one was to meet my lawyer whose office was in ABQ for lunch so we could split the driving time.  I almost choked from the cigarette smoke.
I was really impressed when my (former) mother-in-law was finally coerced to go to a Casino with her daughter (my wife).... she brought a roll of NICKELS (who has rolls of nickels?) and actually found a nickel machine she could plug and did so with a certain fatality.   Before she hit the bottom of the roll, the machine went off like fireworks and by the time the lights and buzzers quit, there was an LED display at the top showing she had won some $250 ish dollars.  It took a good 30 minutes for the casino to actually effect getting physical *tokens* into her hands... she promptly walked over to the cashier and asked for her cash.   Her children cajoled her to go play it back into the machines, trying to convince her that "with her luck, she could hit it big" but she primly folded the cash into her billfold and told them "I'll be waiting in the car".   As I (want to?) remember it, she may have forced the remaining nickels from her roll into her daughter's hand at that point.   I doubt she ever put another nickel into a casino or any other game of chance (Or implied skill)...   she was always a class act.

---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505

505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021, 6:09 PM Prof David West <profw...@fastmail.fm> wrote:

    SteveS,

    Your intuitions are spot on, based on my experience. Although
    casinos can't ban cell phones, you may not use one at the table -
    must step away and not have a hand in play. The do detect and ban
    all kinds of electronic transmissions — radio to infrared and if
    you have such a transmitter on your person you are quickly
    escorted out and banned. Receivers are harder to detect except
    when actively 'receiving' but same result if discovered.

    Blackjack has a published 'standard game' written up years ago —
    casinos will actually give you a copy — that maximizes the players
    odds of winning, at least long term. However there are lots of
    tricks employed to remove even that vestige of a chance, like
    mandatory side bets, and paying even odds instead of 3/2 for a
    blackjack if your bet is below some minimum.

    Casinos are also masters of facial recognition — probably better
    tech than anything any government (including China) or Facebook
    can command. Once banned, even hookers, you will never get more
    than a few feet into a big casino before security descends — even
    if disguised.

    Cash game poker, the house takes a standard rake — 10% up to a
    limit — of the pot as table rent and dealers receive tips plus a
    minimum wage hourly rate. Seniority determines which dealers get
    to service the high limit (hence high tips) tables.

    Tournaments: house takes a portion of the entry fee and rest goes
    into pot. Dealers get hourly rate, plus tips are collected from
    winners and distributed evenly.

    Poker is luck plus very astute inter-personal observation. One of
    my favorite players, Daniel Negreanu, has a Master Class that
    provides all kinds of technical skill, but he does not play that
    way, instead seat of the pants observations and table talk
    determine his strategy. Not that he is unaware of or lacks the
    technical chops, they are just not the ultimate arbitrator of play
    — mostly because all the others in tournaments at his level have
    the same degree of technical skill.

    I did some consulting to casinos a few years back when Highlands
    was trying to start a casino / hospitality program. I have never
    seen such sophisticated and secure systems before or since.

    James Swain has a series of mystery books — first in series is
    /Grift Sense/ — with plots that center on one major attempt to
    defraud a casino and many little side plots that reveal all the
    different attempts to "cheat" casinos. Fun reads.

    A strategy for short term winning at roulette: bet 10 each on two
    of the 1/3 sections of the table (rows or columns) plus one of the
    1:1 sections (even/odd, red/black, top half-bottom have of the
    board), plus 1 dollar on the 0-00 line (half odds but both
    covered).  However, this will not work if you play more than a
    10-15 minutes because it only takes 4.5 times when none of your
    bets hit before you are wiped out. This apparently works because
    the wheel DOES have a bias, mostly from the way the dealer sends
    the ball around the wheel. Watch the history board for patterns
    that reveal the ever so slight but real bias.

    davew


    On Mon, Nov 8, 2021, at 3:51 PM, Steve Smith wrote:

    DaveW-

    Congratulations (or condolences) on your move to Vegas.  Another
    reference gave me the sense you might be at least *wintering* there.

    I probably would not be surprised (though shocked) by what
    Casinos can ban.  I didn't mean to suggest that they didn't have
    the self-granted authority to ban cell phones, etc.  but rather
    doing so would severely impact their popularity among the hordes
    of marks who happily come to give up their spare (or not so) cash
    to feed the bright lights and other egregious displays of wealth.

    The Thomas Bass rendition of Farmer et alia foray into exploiting
    manufacturing/wear biases in roulette wheels Eudamonic Pie
    <https://www.thomasbass.com/the_eudaemonic_pie_1360.htm> suggests
    that today the same effort would be "trivial" with nothing more
    perhaps than a cell phone camera/computer observing from a shirt
    pocket.    Of course, those biases have long since been
    ameliorated one way or another I am sure.

    You describe poker tables as the one place the house has no stake
    in the game.  I have to admit that i don't know who pays the
    rent/real-estate on the table?  Is there a flat-rate rake-off
    from every pot?  Does the dealer live on tips?

    When the Native Casinos opened here, my elderDotter was turning
    18 and she had a friend who thought she wanted to grow up to be a
    blackjack dealer so they frequented the casino.  I don't know
    that my daughter lost/spent much money on it, but she never had
    any illusions that she could "beat the house".   I think their
    game was blackjack which I understand has the built-in tiny but
    positive bias to the house (the house wins all ties by
    convention?).   I told both daughters as they approached college
    that I had saved enough for them to be able to go through a BS/BA
    degree with only part-time/summer work contribution (or healthy
    scholarship) on their part.   I suggested that I cash it out and
    take it to the casino and drop it all on red or black (Roulette)
    with the understanding that their odds ware just a smidge short
    of doubling their money vs losing it all (the one green slot
    represents the house advantage?). The conceit was that if they
    *won* they would then have enough cash to "coast" through college
    as *many* of their peers seemed to be supported or else if they
    *lost* they could forego any implied obligation of going to
    college.   They both honestly mulled it for at least 10 seconds
    before they rolled their eyes and said "no way!".

    I'm curious how you feel about my claim that the inter-personal
    dynamic at the poker table is in some sense more important than
    the technical skill?  My point in your case would be that you
    would be *at* a table where the technical skill level was roughly
    even, right?   Tournament play tends to support that, right? As
    you advance, the skill level of your table-peers increases until
    you either step up YOUR game or fail out of the game?

    I think of you as having a strong mix of technical approach,
    intuition, and likely to engage in the social-emotional game as
    well (e.g. bluffing).

    - Steve

    On 11/8/21 9:42 AM, Prof David West wrote:
    You would be surprised at what casinos can ban. Maybe even more
    surprised at the, not necessarily AI, software tools they use to
    analyze video feeds and pounce on any kind of statistically
    improbabilities. Most casinos in Vegas have tools, like
    mandatory side bets with very low odds, that erase the near
    equal odds of blackjack.

    The only 'safe' gambling is poker where the house has no direct
    interest in the outcome.

    As DES stated, winning is a matter of patience and losing antes
    only, until you get good hand and then skill of playing that
    hand for maximum return — playing less worse than the others at
    the table.

    I am living in Vegas now and playing small tournaments fairly
    regularly.

    davew


    On Sun, Nov 7, 2021, at 7:23 PM, Steve Smith wrote:


    On 11/7/21 12:02 PM, David Eric Smith wrote:
    There must be some kind of “Back to the future” movie that can
    be made out of this.  Doyne Farmer in Vegas all over again,
    but with current-era AI in place of toe-operated computers.

    Yah!  Surely Casinos can't begin to restrict
    computers(phones)/earbuds, etc.  on the gaming floor.

    Strange coincidence that my sister went to Kindergarten with
    Vance Packard (Norm's brother) in Silver City long before they
    all became eagle scouts and then the Chaos Cabal.  We moved
    away the next year and I doubt I ever met any of them back
    then. I came to LANL just before (I think) Doyne came... I seem
    to remember that Norm was there for a summer...  and soon came
    the (in)famous CA conference...   As I remember it the game of
    interest (aside from Life, what with Conway in attendance) was
    GO with a lot of speculation about the implications of local vs
    global "intelligence"...   I was intrigued by HashLife and it's
    implications for finding structure at many scales... I still
    hope for someone with more follow-through than I have to
    implement a more redundant but "thorough" space-time
    decomposition (an N-1xN-1 kernel over the 4 positions at each
    "zoom" level).

    Regarding poker.. I played some low-stakes in college and saw
    there were two things to take in: the main technical skill was
    to simply play less poorly than the other players at the table
    and that was entirely overshadowed by the social-engineering
    games of bluffing, etc.   The very simple game-theoretic aspect
    of not depleting your own stake before you catch a "lucky
    streak" going your way was also a good understanding.   I
    played with my "boss" and a number of peers at the time and
    realized that it was more about jockeying for position at work
    and drinking beer than it was about winning/losing.  I think
    the most I ever lost/won was on the order of $20-$40 which in
    those days was roughly 1-2 shifts wages... a LOT if I joined
    them weekly... too rich for my blood!  I still feel that
    *technically* playing well really means just playing less
    badly.   Blackjack being even more obviously so?


    Yikes.



    On Nov 7, 2021, at 1:56 PM, Marcus Daniels
    <mar...@snoutfarm.com> wrote:

    My inclination would be to invest in standoff biometrics
    (e.g. Eulerian Video Amplification) and then find the best
    poker playing code.   It ought to be possible to automate and
    perhaps get rich in the process.

    *From:*Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com>*On Behalf Of*Eric
    Charles
    *Sent:*Sunday, November 7, 2021 7:42 AM
    *To:*The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
    <friam@redfish.com>
    *Subject:*Re: [FRIAM] lurking

    I DID read all the thread so far... but I'm curious how we
    got to one of the starting points: "as cringy as it may be
    for some dork to be proud of their Poker prowess"

    I am somewhat satisfied with my Poker mediocrity, certainly
    not proud of it... but if I met someone who was ACTUALLY
    startlingly better than I am, and they were proud of that, I
    wouldn't find it cringy. (Ditto in my other hobbies, like
    Aikido.)

    I guess if I met someone who had a slight edge in their
    drunk-buddy home games, and they were super proud of THAT,
    then i would find it cringy. (Ditto someone who's the best
    Aikido student in their small dojo, but who's obviously not
    more than that.)

    When I see academic work on game theory, it's usually of
    lower quality than what the good poker players are doing
    these days. Mastering the game is crazy hard, and being able
    to sit down and implement a coherent and winning strategy for
    40-80 hours a week is not easy. So... why would that be cringe?



    On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 1:42 PM Marcus Daniels
    <mar...@snoutfarm.com> wrote:

        Ok, part of the story is knowing what is really needed
        for reproducibility as a function of context.
        With that, then there's the matter of how much control is
        afforded.   Is it programmable in predictable ways?

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> On Behalf Of u?l? ?>$
        Sent: Wednesday, November 3, 2021 8:20 AM
        To:friam@redfish.com
        Subject: Re: [FRIAM] lurking

        Yeah, I agree. But context is Queen. When the virus is
        created in the lab, it's done with real stuff distilled
        from the soupy world. Given enough of a difference in
        context, the robot may not be able to re-constitute the
        life because the soupy world surrounding the robot
        doesn't have the real stuff required. Such drastic
        context changes could be a result of translation through
        space or time. E.g. trying to construct, on Mars, an
        organism read/serialized on earth. Or e.g. trying to
        construct an organism read millennia ago, millennia in
        the future. It's naive to talk about "science" as if any
        given read-out formula thereby expressed is *complete*.
        Science is abstraction to a large extent ... maybe not as
        abstracting as math, of course. And science must remain
        "open" precisely because any formula it expresses is
        suspect, perhaps incomplete.

        My favorite example is the magic brewing
        
stick:https://medievalmeadandbeer.wordpress.com/2019/05/04/scandinavian-yeast-logs-yeast-rings/It
        *was* scientific to lay out the magic stick as a critical
        element of the brewing process, only to discover later
        that the stick isn't the important part.

        On 11/2/21 2:39 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
        > Even if that were so, viruses have been pulled from
        history or tweaked and created in the lab.   So we have a
        design specification, and the means to make it.    One
        could imagine a robot fabricating the close-to-the-metal
        machine too.  There is a story one can write down how it
        is done.   If there is no story, it is not science we are
        talking about, it is something else.


        --
        "Better to be slapped with the truth than kissed with a lie."
        ☤>$ uǝlƃ


        .-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -.
        .--- ..- --. .- - .
        FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
        Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam
        <http://bit.ly/virtualfriam>
        un/subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
        
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,zW4gfnCEw-aapRghh7ny5t03MK3Rq3qBzZPN7MbtdXMnfOx5f1a4BOQ_kZjD5TYhhqAHjIi_GHC0cpNID7QmaQdIJEXPdJvp7e2YSj9T-Q,,&typo=1>
        FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
        
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,42WSfvOtpfV6Y4enUg6wuYty46Wym2X7PyXyWfqyenKLBcLVwb23M3brrQe1Ygpnu_evLvZtxEK7bFkcshitkPmAQPpH4xkXwt8LCX6FnP03&typo=1>
        archives:
         5/2017 thru
        presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
        
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fpipermail%2ffriam_redfish.com%2f&c=E,1,iXEKOh_9svoFHHsCWA0TbwlILOY3IsE9XdwRauUf8WPQ2GKKbDvhQxuC-IF8qq3KWrXqLIrNxnxVLUtsqex7IJejGUSNsMIb8RUoRuriAA,,&typo=1>
         1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

        .-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -.
        .--- ..- --. .- - .
        FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
        Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam
        <http://bit.ly/virtualfriam>
        un/subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
        
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,xOjquKj_8PwgYgPetFZ4iffchk0Hsdj7KqKj_7lgxEu0hJ4JKtFeVvWGlSzPBqsqqlGfsC7QC4-6YEI60Sn8KQ-dv4hRIYgns3yIkdh09Q,,&typo=1>
        FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
        
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,OtAeUIEXCxUwWlqYdvcpIascVLmMUGFiI0gBRxXqVzPmRDbvz5UW-aBrVg13FiWo3wnj2yGqP2_WzOFRCT60GYXt-MJh8V2srmxRoK5gQ60,&typo=1>
        archives:
         5/2017 thru
        presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
        
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fpipermail%2ffriam_redfish.com%2f&c=E,1,LsKAo_HeNNvVn8e0cDxtHSeLoR3npW-8RPv-a1uTz8vlkpY2g2ckzynNVrsHBLDwefpJafaKIGFZoge5o85zAT3C5I3LbGDSN7M2EA8NsSwMyPY8YbRj&typo=1>
         1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/


    .-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .---
    ..- --. .- - .
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam
    <http://bit.ly/virtualfriam>
    
un/subscribehttps://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,_BlHnyrN4CBEuprXVVy7f_mq3Z-tTWnNTUoEVL2wFjffa3W39HZm7739L-ersuH4jGwn4lOKTAQ0a8LW3Rpg5oX0xA-uGCnMO6QYqE4KE3dZO3-wLhX5WWwF7A4,&typo=1
    
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,_BlHnyrN4CBEuprXVVy7f_mq3Z-tTWnNTUoEVL2wFjffa3W39HZm7739L-ersuH4jGwn4lOKTAQ0a8LW3Rpg5oX0xA-uGCnMO6QYqE4KE3dZO3-wLhX5WWwF7A4,&typo=1>
    
FRIAM-COMIChttps://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,t2v4djJabF5YoxHP9TWOogbl_lizkTlBDrWNSYFDyFQc2oEqq-ghR0tsH7hnRt9tZjI3-MOOrEuLks0GJ9lideLCkCUiGBWRpBsaKIPTaH5r1tdRiQGZ4_qgkg,,&typo=1
    
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,t2v4djJabF5YoxHP9TWOogbl_lizkTlBDrWNSYFDyFQc2oEqq-ghR0tsH7hnRt9tZjI3-MOOrEuLks0GJ9lideLCkCUiGBWRpBsaKIPTaH5r1tdRiQGZ4_qgkg,,&typo=1>
    archives:
    5/2017 thru
    
presenthttps://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fpipermail%2ffriam_redfish.com%2f&c=E,1,1HwvCHzBMHc9q8dL9FwTD6thlBDdmw7i9bSUZebmdoy7AlNV8bl5Inpn6PlDWdxaOG1_3wNax5YCtb2P3_Ct_dVSvtqcKX0fU7ehAs56Y-D2MA,,&typo=1
    
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fpipermail%2ffriam_redfish.com%2f&c=E,1,1HwvCHzBMHc9q8dL9FwTD6thlBDdmw7i9bSUZebmdoy7AlNV8bl5Inpn6PlDWdxaOG1_3wNax5YCtb2P3_Ct_dVSvtqcKX0fU7ehAs56Y-D2MA,,&typo=1>
    1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/


    .-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe  
<http://bit.ly/virtualfriamun/subscribe>  
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
    FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
    archives:
      5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
      1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/



    .-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..-
    --. .- - .
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam
    <http://bit.ly/virtualfriam>
    un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
    FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
    archives:
    5/2017 thru present
    https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
    1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/



    .-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe  
<http://bit.ly/virtualfriamun/subscribe>  
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
    FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
    archives:
      5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
      1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/


    .-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..-
    --. .- - .
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam
    <http://bit.ly/virtualfriam>
    un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
    FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
    archives:
    5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
    1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/



    .-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..-
    --. .- - .
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam
    <http://bit.ly/virtualfriam>
    un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
    FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
    archives:
     5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
     1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/


.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:
  5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:
 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to