Thanks, Keith, for the very interesting discussion of something I didn't
know about, these methane/propane hydrates.

But my friend was discussing oil (petroleum) -- not methane....

I'll ask him for a source.

Cheers,
Lawry

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Keith Hudson
> Sent: Wed, September 03, 2003 12:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Bacterial methane (was RE: [Futurework] There ain't no hydrogen
>
>
> Hi Lawry,
>
> A further (shorter) tutorial is in order I think!
>
> At 09:59 03/09/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> >Greetings,
> >Normally, I don't follow energy discussions...
> >But, I have a query.
> >Recently, a most respected and technically qualified friend visited, and
> >among the other ideas he laid on me was the following:
> >Oil (petroleum) is not created by the decay of biomass over eons. It is
> >created by some form of bacteria.
>
> I think maybe your friend is confusing two (fairly) separate sources of
> natural gas. As far as I'm aware, all the oil and gas fields which have
> been prospected (and they are known now in great detail all over
> the world,
> even in the Antarctic) lie at ancient river estuaries, even if some of
> these are now under the sea (as in the North Sea). The oil and gas is a
> product of the breakdown of the immense amounts of vegetation that were
> deposited in these estuaries from discarded vegetation from dense
> tropical
> rain forests of thousands of square miles in area. Each of these deposits
> would be like a gardener's compost heap -- but many square miles
> in extent
> and maybe miles deep! If sedementary rocks, such as sandstone, were
> subsequently laid down on top of these compost heaps then as the methane
> and propane (or the oil) were produced they would diffuse into the
> micro-crevaces in the overlying rock. And this is what is drilled into in
> your typical oil and gas fields. The gas or oil springs out or
> leaks out --
> or is forced out by injecting high pressure water.
>
> But natural gases, such as methane and propane, as a result of anaerobic
> decomposition, would also be produced by bacteria and small
> insect life in
> even moderately poor soils and this would happen across very
> large portions
> of the earth's surface, not just in the concentrated rain
> forests. If these
> layers were subsequently capped with water then, as the gases
> were produced
> they would diffuse into the water and if, further, very great
> pressure were
> exerted on these layers, or if they became very cold, as in permafrost
> regions, then the gases would be trapped within ice crystals.   These
> deposits are called methane (or propane) hydrates. These are
> found in very
> extensive areas in deep water adjacent to continental shelves
> (that is, in
> areas where a previous land surface has subsided), and also, nearer the
> surface, in northern permafrost tundra regions. The amount of methane in
> these deposits is immense. Estimates of the amount of methane
> vary between
> quantities between 20 and 200 times the amount of natural gas in orthodox
> rock-type gas fields -- more than enough to keep the whole world
> going for
> at least hundreds of years.
>
> However, there are two big drawbacks. For one thing, most of the
> deposits,
> though huge, have very low concentrations of methane and are not economic
> to extract. For another, the deposits would probably be very dangerous to
> exploit because the methane hydrates are liable to melt and
> collapse in an
> uncontrollable way. Under the sea in particular, the methane hydrate
> layers, perhaps hundreds of feet thick could suddenly start
> dissolving into
> a thick sort of water, causing immense slippages of nearby rock and
> coastlines. Already, oil drilling rigs have disappeared when ocean floors
> have suddenly given way when the drill head reached the tip of hydrate
> layers. Any deeper penetration could have caused major landslides
> -- of the
> sort that could drop hundreds of miles of coastline (and many
> miles inland)
> into the sea and produce earthwauke-type tsunami waves that could travel
> for thousands of miles across oceans. There is much evidence that these
> sort of immense landlsides have occurred in times past when sea levels
> dropped during ice ages and the pressure on the methane hydrate
> levels was
> reduced.
>
> In short, methane hydrates are strictly off-limits! Too "hot" to handle.
> There may be places where it is known that the hydrates are both highly
> concentrated and are in restricted undersea valleys where they are hemmed
> in and therefore perhaps not too dangerous to tap into but, even so, the
> oil corporations, desperate though they are for more oil and gas
> resources,
> are not spending any money on research and development of these resources
> and are leaving it to governments, which carry out modest research
> programmes from time to time. Another possibility that has been
> considered
> is that if there were a collapse of a major methane hydrate
> field, then the
> atmosphere could become saturated with methane -- and this is a
> greenhouse
> gas that is 10 times more powerful than CO2 in its temperature-blanketing
> effect.
>
> That seems to be the picture and this is why, despite the quite enormous
> quantities of methane down there, it never enters into scenarios for
> mankind's energy future, corporate or governmental.
>
> KSH
>
> >The implications are that oil may be an
> >unlimited resource, and that we are not drawing down on a
> resource that will
> >become increasingly rare and expensive. Also: productive and
> long-term oil
> >deposits are likely to be more common than commonly thought.
> >
> >My reaction was skepticism, but this friend is no lightweight, has a very
> >strong engineering and scientific background, and carries on an
> active and
> >personal worldwide technology and science scan.
> >
> >Your thoughts?
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Lawry
>
> Keith Hudson, 6 Upper Camden Place, Bath, England,
> <www.evolutionary-economics.org>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to