Richard Guenther wrote: > Btw - can we intially just link with libsup++ omitting libstdc++ so > that we do not get the expected flood of convert-to-STL patches? > Or is the idea of an STL free gcc bad?
I view STL as one of the bits of low-hanging C++ fruit. I think we're all vaguely confused by the VEC APIs, for example; using std::vector seems much better. And, using those kinds of things doesn't require a lot of knowledge of C++ arcana, even if the implementations may use some of that arcana. -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery m...@codesourcery.com (650) 331-3385 x713
