On Sat, 10 Apr 2021, 15:38 John Darrington, <j...@darrington.wattle.id.au> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 01:50:42PM +0100, Bronek Kozicki via Gcc wrote: > > I would > very much prefer if a person who openly expressed opinions, and also > openly > exercised behaviours, which I consider abhorrent, was *not* > associated with > the GCC project. It does not matter to me what kind of control that > person > exerts on the project, if any. What matters to me is association, > even if > indirect one (other than historical). > > > I suppose I feel the same. I would also prefer it if all people involved > with GCC (and all my other interests) did not do or say things which made > me > uncomfortable. I don't however feel that I have the right to call for > anyone > to be excluded simply because I'm uncomfortable with that person's words or > deeds (ie. "consider them abhorent"). That would be an utterly dystopian, > world. > https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_association
