On 14 January 2014 09:17, Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> wrote: > After some time AWOL, I'm digging into the steps needed to move projects to > the Attic. > > The process is listed at: > > http://attic.apache.org/process.html > > Historically I could take care of a lot of it, with a ticket to Infra for a > couple of the items. I've a strong suspicion that I can't do most of these > things anymore. > > Digging into the details: > > > 1. > - Inform users > - Update website with Attic notice *
See below > - Update HEADER.html in downloads * See below > - Update the project DOAP file * See below > - Point SVN mails to general at attic ** > - Make SVN + JIRA/Bugzilla read-only ** > - Delete from committee-info.txt ** Any member or PMC chair has write access to CI.txt > - Create page on Attic site > - Turn off automated builds * > - Remove from www.apache.org navigation **? Any committer has write access to the source for that; they may not be able to deploy, but I expect members can deploy. It's just a bit awkward to find using the CMS. > - Close down infrastructure resources * > - Announce on announce at apache.org > 2. Open a new ticket with a due date 6 months in the future: > - to consider deleting the user list * > - to strip dist/project and add a .htaccess containing: > > RedirectMatch permanent .* > http://attic.apache.org/projects/${project}.html > > > The project handles the informing of users. After that it's over to the > Attic. I've marked the items with a ** if there ones I formally handled and s/formally/formerly/ > no longer have access, and ones with a * that required Infra assistance > previously. Now that downloads are in SVN, it should be possible for the Attic PMC/helpers to be given write access to the relevant part of the tree to allow the downloads to be deleted and the redirects set up. This could be done adhoc or perhaps on a permanent basis - best ask Infra on that. Similarly, most websites now use CMS; so again karma could be granted. > As you can see, it's basically all Infra items now. > Are there any suggestions on the best way to proceed? Is Infra okay with > getting the larger ticket, and what's the best way to formulate it? > > Hen
