i think everyone has a limited amount of time available and will focus their energy where they think it matters. For me, that means that I try to help 'my podlings' to the best of my abilities and only get involved in others when I have 'nothing better to do'. Your primary source of support are the Mentors. If they are missing, then bring that issue to the Incubator PMC to be resolved.
Cheers On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Ian Boston<i...@tfd.co.uk> wrote: > Hi, > This vote has now been in progress for 14 days and has not received the > necessary number of votes from the IPMC to make a release. There has been 1 > +1 binding vote, 1 +2 non-binding vote and no other votes. The vote on > shindig-dev resulted in 7 +1 binding votes, no +0 or -1's > >> Votes so far >> Paul Lindner +1 (non binding) >> Ian Boston +1 (non binding) > > Ant Elder +1 (binding) > > Given the period of time that this vote has been open, it is unlikely that > any more votes will be received and therefore I am closing this vote as > abandoned. > > ------------------------------------ > > If there is a reason why members of the IPMC have decided not to vote on > this release, I would like to hear them, before spending the time doing > another release and wasting the IPMC's time. I will obviously fix the > confirmed non blocker issues identified by Sebb, but the PPMC and Shindig > community has been wanting and trying to release since January and the > expenditure of more effort appears futile *if* there is something > fundamentally wrong with the release that is not being said. > > Thank you > Ian Boston. > > > > > On 8 Jun 2009, at 10:24, Ian Boston wrote: > >> Hi, >> This vote has been in progress for more than 72 hours now. AFICT although >> we have a number of non binding votes from the PPMC, we have no votes from >> the Incubator PMC. >> >> >> >> Votes so far >> Paul Lindner +1 (non binding) >> Ian Boston +1 (non binding) >> >> There were some other non binding votes cast by members Shindig community, >> but unfortunately the did not make it to gene...@incubator >> >> Having read the voting documentation, which does not mention lazy >> consensus for releases, I suspect that we should just abandon this vote and >> start all over again. >> >> However before I do that, I would like some advice from the Incubator PMC >> indicating that is the right thing to do? >> >> >> Thank you >> Ian >> >> >> On 4 Jun 2009, at 12:28, Ian Boston wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache >>> Shindig version 1.0-incubating. >>> Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations >>> of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial >>> applications. >>> >>> Vote Thread. >>> http://markmail.org/thread/mrk4uwe7mg5e3uho >>> >>> >>> >>> Proposed release: >>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/shindig-staging-002//org/apache/shindig/shindig/1.0-incubating/ >>> >>> SVN Tag is >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/shindig/tags/shindig-project-1.0-incubating/ >>> revision 780648 >>> >>> >>> Vote open for 72 hours. >>> >>> [ ] +1 >>> [ ] +0 >>> [ ] -1 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Ian >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org