> If the Incubator is not sure that a podling is small but healthy, then > would the board be in a better position to make that judgement after > graduation?
In the case at hand (Isis), I'd propose that the IPMC could assert that they are healthy -- with an asterix. Never having seen them incorporate a new contributor, we can't say that they are, in fact, a track record of welcoming new contributors. I have two motivations for looking for a 'special set of rules.' (a) the voices here advocating squashing podlings that don't graduate in some fixed time interval, and (b) the desire to reduce mentor load. The 'special set of rules' would recognize, in effect, that this project still needs some more supervision, but could be trusted with its own svn karma, etc. > > An easy way to trial conditional graduation would be to allow small > podlings (who meet our other graduation criteria) to move from the > main sequence to a special set of rules. > > Robert > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
