I don't find the discussion on members@ that comes to this conclusion. If you cannot see members@ how do you know this?
Doug On Oct 1, 2013 6:06 PM, "Justin Mclean" <justinmcl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > I see no discrepancy between the documents you cite. The first says > > that committer votes are by consensus, the second says that > > "procedural" votes are by majority, but doesn't define procedural and > > there's no implication that it includes committer votes. > > There was conversation on members@ in the last couple of days (which I'm > unable to view) that came to the opposite conclusion, so there's some > confusion/differing opinion on the matter. > > Context is that I was under the assumption that consensus was required to > vote a committer in, other PMC members thought otherwise or were unsure. On > looking into it, I found it does vary from project to project and that it > didn't seem to be defined clearly anywhere if your project doesn't have > bylaws/guidelines. > > Thanks, > Justin > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
