On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com>wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > I would like to propose a rewrite of [1] by borrowing heavily from [2] > but > > making sure to emphasize that projects are allowed to have different > rules > > for all of them (or is the code-commit veto required for all projects). > > Any objections to me trying to do that? > > Rather than a "rewrite", I suggest proposing small, incremental, reversible > changes. Governance is easy to mess up. > > It would be so nice if we could write unit tests for governance docs to > make > sure that as they evolve they still solve all the old problems they were > intended to address. > > That's a really interesting perspective: governance rules as code, that can be unit tested. Heh I like that. -- Regards, -- Alex
