The JBoss guys are very smart. Scott Stark is extremely high caliber. Mark is no idiot either. Jboss is successful because it is so fucking good. From where I stand, the other appservers are just copying JBoss. Where do you think the MBean architecture in Weblogic 6.x came from?
The problem with JBoss is that while they innovate BEA and IBM make all the dough. Such is the nature of opensource. Bloody fucking hell! (From what I hear Orion is pretty good too.) At 02:18 08.01.2002 +0100, you wrote: >> Jboss's success seems to be one project. I'm actually glad they went to >> sourceforge...they would have struggled to survive here... > >How can you know? > >I have studied their code and their documentation some months ago, I >have also followed some of their mailling lists for sometime and that is >not that obvious to me. > >I do NOT prefer what they call community. I do not find their code that >good. I do not like their documentation that much. > >JBoss success has a lot to do with the lack of credible alternative for >something with a lot of demand, unlike Jakarta products like Tomcat or >Velocity. > >Give me a better case and/or concrete reasons, please. > > >Have fun, >Paulo Gaspar > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jon Scott Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1:25 AM >> >> on 1/7/02 4:26 PM, "Paulo Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Which projects are those? >> > Can you really compare them - and their community - with Jakarta? >> >> Jboss's success seems to be one project. I'm actually glad they went to >> sourceforge...they would have struggled to survive here... >> >> -jon > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Ceki Gülcü - http://qos.ch -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
