Rémy, You will probably need to resend the CCLA...i can't find in the regular location where ccla's are recorded.
- Can u please explain what you mean by "current attitude"? - Are u saying that Tomcat is *NOT* really "Apache Tomcat"? - Are you saying that we need to formalize a mechanism to figure out which company is a leading contributor to a certain project? thanks, dims PS: Remember, i was with you last time there was a blow up about certain contributions to Tomcat. On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:04:44 +0100, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Henri Yandell wrote: > > Due to the timeliness of this, I plan to send it Sunday night. Given > > that we're on a weekend, I doubt it will be read until Monday. > > > > Any opinions? > > I am definitely contributing to Tomcat as part of my employment at > JBoss. I am not contributing on my own free time to Tomcat as an > individual at the moment, and (as far as I can remember, as it was a > while ago ...) have submitted a company CLA reflecting that > (http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas). Anyway, it is obvious Apache has > the notion of company contributions. Stating otherwise is wrong, and > does not match the legal documents the ASF uses. > > I think continuing with the current attitude would only lead my company > to reevaluate its involvement in ASF projects, and I could not really > blame them if they did. Of course, this may be what some people here > seek (hopefully, it is not and it's just my paranoia at work). > > Rémy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
